These are sitting in a used clothing boutique near me and are VNDS, the look worn once or twice.
The only thing is that they feel cheap, and thin. The tongue isn't puffy at all, but since these aren't an OG, I have no idea if these were made thinner and cheap feeling.
Any thoughts, anyone?
Another big difference is the tongue. The UA tongue is good, really good. It is as standard as the mass produced authentic J1s. But on the SBBs the tongue is thick. It has more padding than the standard issue J1s. It is a noticeable difference when you have both pair in hand.
UPDATE:
Color
Insoles
Toe box height - authentic pair is higher up
UA toebox - perforations show white underneath as if there is a sneaker shield underneath but there is not one. Perforations aren't punched through all the way.
And the glitter defect on legit pairs.
Other minor nuances...
Your best bet it to get them from a legit source. If it seems too good to be true, it IS. Hence my thread here and then going to Stock X and buying from a trusted seller.
I know they were having issues with shoes during that time frame with the glitter coming off the black. But those were legit pairs. Did they correct that on later production?
I was definitely skeptical on the insoles. I could tell that they didn't capture the light refraction correctly in the shattered glass. That was a red flag for sure when I got them in hand.
You can see the difference for sure compared to yours.
I think the SBBs from StockX might be coming from overseas. They have been in transit for 2 days now. UNGH
I can't get the inserts out of the original SBBs that I posted and I want to return them for my money back, so I don't want to destroy them.
Here is a pick of the insole under the best...