Search results

The different heights of the shoes should already mean there is something wrong with this pair. Also i dont think that the jumpman printed in the insole should peel off like that for authentic pairs.id say they are fakes or at least the left one is. Even if they are legit, the obvious height...

Yup, the gamma blues are fake.23 too wide and the carbon fiber is just plastic. The space jams look ok but are too beat up already.Also, are the laces replacement laces, it looks weird.

The font colors on the strip are correct and there is enough black spacing above the jumpman logo on the pull tab. Id day this is legit.

Looks good, however, the 'R' on the jumpman jordan tongue strip kinda looks like a 'Q' (second pic).might be the angle.

So far looks good. The back strip/pull tab can also help. If you can get a photo of that it would be better.

To add, the jumpman on the insole looks off. It looks fat compared to auyhentic jumpman print on insole.

The space jams look good. The legend blues look off. The 23 on the back looked stretched. The outsole i think should be more of a bluish tint.

The black upper/outsole with white midsole also already released in the Philippines around May 6. Was able to see it in store.

The reverse jumpmans maybe caused by a flipped image.youll also notice that the 23 at the back is also flipped - 3 is like an E. Also the traction pod color might just be lighting. I think the image below shows yellow-ish pods ***...

It looks legit from the photos you posted. Get photos of the carbon fiber as well, it shouldnt be very shiny like plastic. Ive seen fake 12s in youtube that look good except for the carbon fiber.

I believe these are the aj 2011 aflight.which is an iteration of the aj2011 without the interchangeable midsoles.

Hmm, OGs dont cone with retro card and jordan box.

You might want to ask why the shoe is "bent" at the heel area.that should not be due to normal usage.

Yup, thats just a quality check issue.my retail pair (bought from a nike store) also came with that, but, mine is much worse.

The cherry 12s look ok.space above jumpman on tongue and back tag.looks beat up though and the laces does not look like the original laces.

Looks good.however, the patent cut on is higher on the side near the toebox on right shoe - might just be a quality issue though.

Besidea what they mentioned, the toebox and overall shape seems off as well.

It looks legit.

The R in Jumpman Jordan also looks like a Q. Also the  white midsole at the back is not pointed. I'd say its fake.