Mike and Tinker agreed to that shoe due to the representation the outsoles had symbolizing his global popularity. Atleast this is what Tinker said in an interview.
Easily in if the shape is right. They gotta lower the boom on the puffy look on these. It was too much for me with the 2016 pair. Its the only playoff Jordan I do not have.
The size gives me the thought that maybe due to how large the back tab has to be to fit with that shoe size, the tell of speckle between k and e may not apply. Mold and paint scheme may have had slightly different specs.
I wish I had a concete answer here. Hopefully others will chime in. I remember back when that thread was hot it was all about real to fake and speckle density lol. Maybe review that thread or watch some comparison videos for more reference. All I remember hearing over and over again was...
Gym rotation when I do decide to wear em. They are all beat and fit perfectly to my foot. 7 still feels like pillows. Not of them are uncomfortable to me at all though.
I didnt know a 1994 model retro shoe was to have the same feel expectation from a trainer kick in 2024. I have Under Armor that I wear to the gym that feels better than any Jordan I own. I paid 45 bucks for them. At what point did our comfort expectation of 25 plus year old copies alighn...