@JFBollin
Yeap. Mostly non-Asics stuff (think Sebago, Tim's, etc.), but this relationship is nothing new...
Now them holding his Asics collab's is completely new to me (and others seems like).
Could have been a plug-job for the "homies at Ruze" or something, but why so many pairs to them?
Is it worth you not buying, tho?! These complaints have been around for years...Don't really see Kith changing it, smh.
Adds to the adrenaline/inertia of the brand, unfortunately...
He tweeted somebody something like "aren't all 25th pairs 1990 produced" or some cryptic ish
I remember seeing it and thinking "typical Aaron mind-games" but very intrigued now. Ruze has been carrying Fieg product for years, though, so the "Why now" is my real question
I hear ya'. Agree with retro runner vibe - that monotone upper with altered midsole/sole doesn't hurt. May photoshop salmon's just to play with silhouette and coloring a bit this weekend.
Could turn out hideous when that design is exposed with diff. CW. :rollin
Ruze has sold RF's Sebago's over the year's too, though. There's probably some kind of relationship there.
Production runs for limited/exclusive shoes "out of nowhere" can happen at a moment's notice. (Nike has an official VIP process for this, actually). New auth/un-auth production run isn't...
Oh, and Ruze shoes could get 200 straight neg feedback with no positive off this debacle and still have 90,000+ overall feedback with 98.6% - ish rate, btw. eBay/PayPal Authenticity and CC Chargeback is a real safety net here, but feedback seems not to be. Hope ya'll flourish, doe.
-A.D.
@dunglan7 Could file claim with UPS if you didn't authorize release
OR
you could cop Homage's for the low on eBay, replenish your sneaker stash, and keep this thread alive in a few clicks