lol... thanks guys. the only reason i was leaning towards the trade was because i have 3 extra pairs. But in the end i just decided not to do it. Thanks for all the great input guys.
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
my initial reaction was that these were the most recent retros. yes, i jumped the gun real quick on it. since i got all this heat from my comment i did do a bit more research.
but yes, being that these are the 2000 editions, i stand corrected. these are 100% LEGIT. i apologize for the...
Bought these a few years back off ebay, i bought them for a pretty good price if i recall. i have worn them quite a few times. let me know NT
Thanks<Br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
FAKE!!!!!!!
this is why:
1. jump man symbol, his right hand should not look freddie krueger.
2. the tounge of teh shoe is too low, should be higher
3. the 23 should not be attached with a single stich. they should be completely seperate
4. the back view of the shoe, it should be wider then the...
FAKE!!!!!!!
this is why:
1. jump man symbol, his right hand should not look freddie krueger.
2. the tounge of teh shoe is too low, should be higher
3. the 23 should not be attached with a single stich. they should be completely seperate
4. the back view of the shoe, it should be wider then the...
FAKE!!!!!!!
this is why:
1. jump man symbol, his right hand should not look freddie krueger.
2. the tounge of teh shoe is too low, should be higher
3. the 23 should not be attached with a single stich. they should be completely seperate
4. the back view of the shoe, it should be wider then the...
FAKE!!!!!!!
this is why:
1. jump man symbol, his right hand should not look freddie krueger.
2. the tounge of teh shoe is too low, should be higher
3. the 23 should not be attached with a single stich. they should be completely seperate
4. the back view of the shoe, it should be wider then the...
FAKE!!!!!!!
this is why:
1. jump man symbol, his right hand should not look freddie krueger.
2. the tounge of teh shoe is too low, should be higher
3. the 23 should not be attached with a single stich. they should be completely seperate
4. the back view of the shoe, it should be wider then the...