- 1,866
- 132
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
Cushing lost his man boobs and got back on the juice. Who is dude on the right Taylor Mays?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I assume you've never seen steroid pimples, cuz he doesn't have them. Steroid pimples are NASTY and big as hellOriginally Posted by dreClark
_'s look like action figures...
And Cush got them steroid pimples like Triple H
Originally Posted by Newbs24
^ Yes that is Mr 4.24 in the 40 at 235lbs.
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Phil Steele has started his Top 25 countdown, so far..
25. Pitt
24. FSU
23. Tennessee
22. Oregon
21. Wisconsin
I love gambling on college football more than the sport itself...so Steele is #1 in my book. National preview Mag goes on sale in June.
Why they have to use that picture???
And US in the top 25? At this time???
But, I'll take it.
Destin, Fla. - The SEC is about to make one of the biggest decisions in its 75-year history.
Simply put: Given the enormous popularity of its sports programs has the time come for the conference to create its own television network?
The SEC's football and basketball contacts with its three television partners - CBS, ESPN, and Raycom (formerly Lincoln-Financial) - expire next spring. Negotiations on new deals are under way and conference officials have told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the SEC hopes to have new contracts in place by late summer or early fall.
Part of those negotiations, however, is the SEC's option to create its own network as two other conferences - The Big Ten and the Mountain West - have done. The SEC has been pondering this idea for several years but now it is time to decide.
"The charge we have received from our institutions is to explore two models when it comes to the future of TV in our conference," commissioner Mike Slive said. "One is the traditional route that we have now. The second is to incorporate an SEC network that gives us a greater opportunity for exposure for all of our sports."
Because of the sensitivity of these negotiations, the SEC has asked its members not to discuss the television issues in any kind of detail this week. But Georgia athletics director Damon Evans believes than an SEC TV network is something that must be considered.
"It's a very complicated issue and there are a lot of things you must balance," Evans said. "But I'm the athletics director at Georgia and that means I want to see Georgia on TV as much as possible. Maybe the time is not right to do it now. But this is a discussion we have to have."
This much everyone can agree on. An SEC TV network would give the conference more exposure and bring in more money - perhaps a lot more money.
Neither the Big Ten Network (BTN) nor The Mtn. (Mountain West Sports Network) has turned a profit since they were launched. But the contracts guarantee the conferences will get their money no matter what. In the case of the Big Ten, which signed a 20-year deal with Fox, each school gets an additional $7 million per year.
"Some of our schools have used that money to build facilities and others have used it on the academic side," said Mike Vest, a spokesman for the Big Ten Network. "Over the life of the contract it is a significant boost to the schools."
If the SEC creates its own TV network, CBS and ESPN would still get the early picks among SEC football games. An SEC TV network would kick in on the next tier of games to which Raycom now owns the rights.
So if anybody should be nervous right now, it is Raycom.
"We have a long standing relationship as a television partner with the SEC and we look forward to continuing that relationship," said Jimmy Rayburn, the executive producer for SEC football for Raycom.
So if the SEC network gives the league more exposure and more money then why not do it?
Three problems: Distribution. Distribution. Distribution.
When the Big Ten Network was launched, the league did not have a deal with a major cable TV provider. As a result only about a third of the people in the Big Ten footprint could actually get the BTN. Commissioner Jim Delany caught a lot of heat from fans. The Big Ten will soon sign a deal with Comcast that will solve most of its distribution problems.
But if the SEC launches a network it will require almost 100 percent distribution on Day 1.
Example: The 2007 Alabama-Tennessee game was on Lincoln-Financial. What would have happened if that game had been on the SEC TV network and, because of distribution problems, some fans in those states could not see it?
"In the Big Ten something like that would make people mad," said one TV executive who asked that his name be withheld. "In the SEC there would have been bodily injury."
A number of suitors have indicated that they would be more than willing to help the SEC with its distribution issues. Atlanta-based FSN South, which also owns SportSouth, already has the infrastructure in place as it reaches 21 million homes in SEC territory.
"I will simply say that we are interested in discussing whatever TV model the SEC decides to pursue," said Jeff Genthner, the senior vice-president of FSN South.
CSS, which is also based in Atlanta, would like to use its partnership with cable companies Comcast and Charter Communications as leverage to get the SEC to look its way if it creates a network.
"All I can say is that we would hope to be a part of those discussions," said Mark Fuhrman, the general manager at CSS.
But at the end of the day, the SEC may decide that the current TV model works just fine. The league had 48 conference football games last season. All but nine were broadcast live by their current TV partners. The SEC made $43 million from televised football last season. It could be that the mere possibility of an SEC network is leverage enough to get the kind of deal they want.
"It's an interesting time to be sure," Slive said. "All I can tell you is to stay tuned."
DESTIN, Fla. -- If the majority of SEC head football coaches have their way, the recruiting period will be split into two different signing days.
The coaches voted by a 9-3 count Wednesday at the SEC spring meetings to add an early signing day in late November. This 24-hour period for prospects to sign early would fall on the Monday before the contact period begins, which during a normal year would come during the week of Thanksgiving.
The next step is for the SEC's athletic directors and presidents to sign off on the proposal and then sponsor it on a national level. Most of the coaches agree that it would probably be at least a year before an early signing day would go into effect, and that's assuming the proposal passes.
"I certainly think it makes sense," Kentucky's Rich Brooks said. "But I've seen a 12-0 vote by the coaches before on certain things, and it never passed. So we'll see." The three coaches who voted against the early signing day were Arkansas' Bobby Petrino, Florida's Urban Meyer and South Carolina's Steve Spurrier.
"I think recruiting should be done in December, January and February," Meyer said. "I think it speeds up 17- and 18-year-olds to make a decision that affects the rest of their lives. To squeeze them, to press them, to say you've got to get it done now and I just don't believe in that. "My daughter is going through recruiting right now. If someone ever does that to her, it's going to be a tough phone call. Take your time. Take your trips."
A year ago, the SEC coaches voted 9-3 against adding an early signing day. But the new proposal includes some specific language that swayed several coaches to vote in favor of it this year. In particular, any prospect that has already made an official visit to a school would be precluded from signing early.
"The majority of the coaches do not want to change the culture of the season as it is right now," Mississippi State's Sylvester Croom said. "This allows kids to sign early where we don't have to continually recruit a kid who wants to sign, but still not change the process from what it already is. We're totally opposed to any other [early] signing day other than the way we have it worded."
The current signing day for football falls on the first Wednesday in February. One of the reasons most of the SEC coaches favor an early signing period is because so many prospects commit early and then hold everybody hostage as they look around in January and February. Tennessee's Phillip Fulmer at one time opposed an early signing period because he felt it would be a disadvantage for the Vols in that they do so much national recruiting. "But as recruiting has continued to move up, there's really no reason you can't get some of the guys off the board and not have to spend that time and money babysitting kids the entire month of January," Fulmer said.
Croom points out many more prospects are already taking unofficial visits during the summer and fall months. The SEC's new proposal would allow prospects to continue taking unofficial visits where they pay their own way and still be eligible to sign early. But if a prospect takes an official visit, one that's paid for by a school, he would be locked into having to sign in February. "He can take all the unofficial visits he wants," Croom said. "They're already doing it. That was our point. A lot of these kids have gone on unofficial visits. They've seen the academic counselor. They've seen everything there is to see. They want to get the signing out of the way. If we can get that out of the way, now we don't have to go and call that kid every day and go to his high school every week. We can be recruiting somebody else."
Petrino's argument against the early signing day is that the Razorbacks have to do so much of their recruiting outside the state. "Guys in favor of it have 40, 50 or 60 Division I players in their state," Petrino said. "We have to go out and battle and go on the road and recruit every state."
Spurrier's beef is that another signing day would only take away from the actual season, especially with so many fans clamoring for any morsal of recruiting information they can get their hands on.
Alabama's Nick Saban, still peeved about head coaches being taken off the road during the spring recruiting period, likes the proposal. But he also knows it will still be scrutinized.
"All coaches seem to be paranoid, and they're all worried about what the other guy is going to do," said Saban, who's gotten around the spring rule by using video conferencing to talk with prospects. "So everybody is going to have to go back and digest how this affects them and who has the greatest advantage.
"The rules are all the same for everybody. So whether it's an advantage to Georgia because they've got a lot of players in state, or Florida, because they have a lot of players in state & I'd just as soon they get them out of the way so we can go get the other guys. I see it as an advantage for us, too. Everybody knows I'm crazy, thinks I'm crazy. So what I think doesn't really matter."
I'm inclined to favor this one...but only because it's Spurrier, Meyer, and that +%%%# Petrino who voted against it.
Spurrier, Meyer, and that +%%%# Petrino
All of whom like to steal recruits....Prolly why they are against it....