- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
^Knicks fan salty about Pippen and Hakeem. There's a surprise.
The Bulls were still talented with out Jordan but when Jordan left for 2 years he couldnt even get them to the finals by himself.
im not saying Pippen wasnt great. he was. He did a great job assisting jordan and he was easily the best side kick in NBA history. And he did take theBulls to the ECF both those years with out MJ. But to answer your question YES Scottie should have been able to lead his team to the finals, and it is anegative that he didnt, if yall are saying he is better than Bird who would do that on the regular. So do not stoneface me on that if he wants to be considered#1 you have to do that on your own not do it while MJ is dropping 45 a night. Bird not only led his team to the finals by himself numrous times, but he won. Asthe leader of the team with a bunch of role players around him as well. If you think Bird was better than Pippen you must be out of your mind. pip couldnt eventopple Ewing and the Knicks in 94, and as much as i love Ewng he didnt even win a ring (although it was mostly because of MJ). You cant compare a guy likePippen to a guy who led his team to numerous titles like Bird. Pippen was a great player and easily top 5, but in order to be as good as Larry Bird he wouldhave had to lead his team to success like Bird did almost every year in the 80s, pippen NEVER did that. and no this is not me being a salty Knicks fan this iscommon sense.
As well as Hakeem. I love Hakeem and i agree he was a tremendous player. But he cant compete with Kareems numerous rings and bing the NBA all time leadingscorers as well as making a shot trademark for him as his hook was unstoppable. You cannot compare Hakeem to that although he was great.
and you cant compare him to a man that consistently led his team to rings over and over again. I mean how you gonna even try to compre him to russel he haswhat 11 rings?
and than again you cant compare him to Wilt either. Wilt was the most dominant player of all time, and Hakeem was not even close to as dominant. Hakeem hashad NOTHING like 100 point games or 50+ rebound games. AND Wilt has more rings, name one category where Hakeem wins out there?
i mean cmon m not salty. im not saying Pippen and Hakeem werent good even great. But you cant compare a guy like Pippen to a guy like Bird, and Hakeem wasgreat but to say he was the GOAT over some of the most dominant players of all time in Kareem, russel, and Wilt is obsurd. He is DEFINITLEY in the next tier ofcenters wit Shaq and Pat. Get out of here with that salty Knicks fan %*+#, it is really just some common sense.
EDIT: and to add on to my Pippen argument, to add on to the fact that Bird LED his team to success just look at the stats as well. Bird averaged 24.3 ppgthroughout his career and is regarded as one of the best shooters of all time, Pippen averaged only 16.1 ppg. Bird ALSO averaged more assists and reboundsaveraging 6.3 and 10.0 respectively while Scottie averaged only 5.2 and 6.4. Also Bird was twice named NBA Finals MVP and 3 times NBA MVP 2 awards that pippennever won, as well as being on 9 NBA 1st teams to Pippen's 3. Add that to the fact that Bird LED his team to success. Which as stated before Scottie wasntable to do without MJ's LEADERSHIP. There really should be NO argument, i do not care what kind of fan you are. HOW please tell me HOW can any of you whothink pippen is #1 say that he is better than Bird? Someone please answer me because i am kind of intrigued at this point.
EDIT EDIT: and please give me an answer because i really dont understand the logic behind anyone saying Scottie is better than Larry unless they are eitherbiased Bulls fans/MJ lovers or ignorant about basketball... no one??