- 286
- 45
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
My raiders trainers fit tts for sure as do all of my other sc's so i feel safe going tts with these
AGAIN?? Nike Trainer SC High Retro - Spring 2013
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by deewlay,
- Start date
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
hopefully mine are coming in the nxt hour of less!! IM STOKED!!!
everyone rdy for a comparison video????
its gonna be between the 1998, 2009 and 2013's.
everyone rdy for a comparison video????
its gonna be between the 1998, 2009 and 2013's.
- 13,923
- 5,893
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2004
I think every single pair had some sort of imperfection. Mine had scratches/gashes and paint splatter in misc. places. That may be the only difference I see between the two. That could be enough for most to want to pick up a pair.. I still can't defend the pleather quality. Precreased or not, they just had that wal mart feel for 400% markup.
dmxgod, I will not be picking up a pair. I still have a 2009 that has only been worn 10 times and looks absolutely trashed. The midsole just sucks in any dirt and keeps it there. The rippling/waviness of the pleather toebox is the ultimate turnoff. If, for some reason the 2013s don't do this, I may consider. But for now, I pretty much have a shoe no one wants above $20 resell, and I sorta don't want to sell. I'm stuck with them, and wouldn't want to be stuck with another.
I will say, comfort was never an issue with the 2009 retros. The sockliner and ankle padding was quite plush. The midsole air, I never really felt, but the shoes never felt like bricks.
The other bitter moment in my life just happened last month when I saw my 1999 pimentos (my last late 90 era sc high) show signs of midsole foam crumbling. I pretty much have nothing left to wear but the trashy 09 auburns.
ekhunter,
You know I'm ready. I'll jump out of the wood work, at will when it comes to comparison vids.
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
not to bust anyones bubble, but as far as i can see my 2009's have a better leather quality then these 13's, if thats even possable. i'm sorta let down here.
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
what we really need. especially in the White/White-New Green-Black (teals)
Like who wouldnt KILL for a pair of trainer sc's in LASER BLUE, they are womens but with a lil tweak they could b relesed as a mens.
gotta love the og's.
Like who wouldnt KILL for a pair of trainer sc's in LASER BLUE, they are womens but with a lil tweak they could b relesed as a mens.
gotta love the og's.
- 8,513
- 3,513
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
Caved and got a pair today, the toe creases, but at least it's in the spot where it should crease and not that nasty thing across the toe box. I can live with these.
- 15,722
- 12,101
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
forget it release date for auburns is the 23rd
Last edited:
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
mine got some wrinkles in like 3 different places, STOCk!!
stock creases? not cool!!, lol they are in weird places too!
stock creases? not cool!!, lol they are in weird places too!
- 4,177
- 2,767
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2003
Post up that comparison video when its done!
- 8,624
- 11,672
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
New Super Bowl trophy color way on sneakernews.
- 8,513
- 3,513
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
What's up with these super low key Super Bowl releases? They did that QS of the 1972, which I've only seen available from euro shops and now these.
- 1,785
- 48
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
2013 retro (via Packer Shoes) http://ps941.com/2013/02/21/nike-ai...iner-huarache-94-blackhyper-red-packer-shoes/
- 2,396
- 2,647
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
^^^ those are clean. Packer exclusive?
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,941
- 22,452
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
^ C'mon son...just read the thread for 5 minutes and you will have answered your own question.
- 14,132
- 285
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2004
NDC supposed to get these tomorrow?
- 312
- 137
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2004
yup and finishline too
- 4,817
- 1,821
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
Saw these in person today. They don't look bad at all but the tongue is really flimsy, like paper thin. I'm good on these. My 09s are still in good shape and I have a second pair DS. The 2013 leather looks a little better but not a huge difference otherwise.
- 8,560
- 3,537
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
- 1,841
- 73
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2009
didn't by the 09s will get these
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
they r the exact same shoe, the hues are a TINY bit diff, and the leather is worse in my opnion, so its not like you are missing anything, you basically have this shoe allrdy1
- 57,350
- 29,293
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2006
Yeah, from that last pic the tongue does look a bit thinner/softer than the '09's.
But interesting how, from the pics, the rest of the shoe looks pretty much the same.
- 1,564
- 909
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2011
its alot thinner
- 7,168
- 4,008
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
hahaha is this a Packers exclusive, that had to be a joke
- 90
- 19
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
Hope the quality isn't too bad, will be the first time coping these .
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
The total orange is an instacop, didn't realize they were releasing agai
