Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…

[NToweG]

37
38 I wonder if it'll have a strap
39 anxiously waiting
40 anxiously waiting
41 JB better fullfil some big expectations
42 this signature better NOT drop before the white/red aj12's.
....I'll stop lol

 

[wizards23brown]

As basketball shoe maybe the 34s are better.. For a shoe to put miles in 35s are much better IMO.. The 34s don’t last and are flimsy, 35s are sturdier and very comfortable. 35s had better colorways also. I would probably take the 34 SE over the. 35 but it’s hard to call.

Either way I would for sure take the 36s over either the those two. I saw someone wearing the “Heatwave” colorway at Disney and and was VERY impressed with them!! I wasn’t planing on getting that colorway but damm

 

[jshortt]

37
38 I wonder if it'll have a strap
39 anxiously waiting
40 anxiously waiting
41 JB better fullfil some big expectations
42 this signature better NOT drop before the white/red aj12's.
....I'll stop lol

I feel like there's almost no way the 38's don't have some sort of strap/lockdown. At least asong as they keep with this line of trying to take a cue or two from each of the previous models.

 

[AIR J XIII]

I feel like there's almost no way the 38's don't have some sort of strap/lockdown. At least asong as they keep with this line of trying to take a cue or two from each of the previous models.

It doesn't seem like they're even going that far with the 37. The 38 could only have chenille on the tongue, or just have the abstract graphic from the heel counter of the VIII somewhere

 

[rbk93]

35s > 34s easy

Agreed.

31 wasnt around for it.
32 outstanding shoe but the shroud killed it. Lows were good.
33 not a aj3 guy
34 fire but needed more colorways(especially with a black bottom)
35 same vibe as the aj5's. Like'em a lot but wouldnt wear them.
36 same as 34.

Felt 31s get a lot of love here but I don't like them. Design wasn't well executed.
32s are great
33s are kind of gaudy.
34s are not a bad shoe, but I see 0 resemblance to the 1989 model.
35s are OK, nothing special
36s are solid depending the CW
37s will be GOATED.

 

[NToweG]

Agreed.

Felt 31s get a lot of love here but I don't like them. Design wasn't well executed.
32s are great
33s are kind of gaudy.
34s are not a bad shoe, but I see 0 resemblance to the 1989 model.
35s are OK, nothing special
36s are solid depending the CW
37s will be GOATED.

Why do you feel that way about the 37's?
Are u a seven lova'?

 

[sooperhooper]

34
36
33
The rest

 

[carolinakickg]

34
31
36
30
32
33

 

[Public Enemy]

So it's been a little over a week now and no other info about the shoe? No confirmation or articles from some of the major sneaker news websites? Weird.

 

[sneeker]

my ranking would be

36
34
32
35
31
30
33

 

[jshortt]

It doesn't seem like they're even going that far with the 37. The 38 could only have chenille on the tongue, or just have the abstract graphic from the heel counter of the VIII somewhere

But...we don't even know if we've seen the 37's yet.

 

[dmoney23444]

So it's been a little over a week now and no other info about the shoe? No confirmation or articles from some of the major sneaker news websites? Weird.

Tatum may have been told to not wear them in front of cameras again lol.

 

[AIR J XIII]

But...we don't even know if want to accept that we've seen the 37's already.

Fixed

 

[rbk93]

Why do you feel that way about the 37's?
Are u a seven lova'?

Favorite design and comfort wise out of 1-14. 1-23 really.

The XX3 is something special too, a class amongst itself from the 15-23.

 

[sicembu]

I'm keeping my eye on this thread. I didn't buy a pair of 36's mainly because I wear low top shoes in my old age.

 

[jshortt]

Fixed

Doesn't have anything to do with me wanting to accept or not accept anything yet lol. All I'm saying is if those ARE the 37, we haven't seen clear enough pics of anything to say whether there is or isn't a heavy 7 influence.

 

[dmoney23444]

 

[sneeker]

WestBrook-ish. so far, not looking good.

 

[wizards23brown]

Would bet money on those being the 37s after seeing these two pics..

Not feeling the colorway so much but they have potential for sure.. The new sig shoe always takes some getting used to before they grow on you.

 

[jshortt]

Would bet money on those being the 37s after seeing these two pics..

Not feeling the colorway so much but they have potential for sure.. The new sig shoe always takes some getting used to before they grow on you.

Like I said the other day... Peaks at the heel, zigzag pattern on the upper, possible detached ankle, and the similar outsole. Certainly would appear to be, but I'd really like to see some clearer pics so we can actually catch some of these design cues.

 

[sicembu]

Remind me a little of the 22.

 

[vettez06]

35 was super trash. These already look better.

35 was pure trash.

Do you like the 36’s?

 

[sooperhooper]

Do you like the 36’s?

Yeah.

 

[picasso swerve]

Do you like the 36’s?

Yeah 36 and 34 were the only good looking ones from the 30’s.

 

[vettez06]

Yeah.

Yeah 36 and 34 were the only good looking ones from the 30’s.

It’s strange how you two say the 35’s a “Trash” when visually, the shoes are very similar to the 36’s.