- 3,855
- 2,261
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
If these end up in outlets ima cop. I probably need new basketball shoes
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Really? That was a reach my man..... the toebox is nice...Up until this pic I never noticed that the jumpman actually looks like a chick getting plowed
What are those to the right of the xxx?
Yes..... Lol.
Wow.... very nice! We are walkin around in 20 yr old patent leather basketball shoes waiting for another colorway to come back again! Well, I'm moving on to the new! These are great.
Agreed, that 3m Jumpman is sick. Would have been putrid if it was a solid fixture.I jumped the gun. I was harsh about that big Jumpman on the toe, but the way they did it with that new material where it isn't seen all of the time depending on light and angle is really cool. Great job, JB. [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]127995[/emoji]
They couldn't keep all the tech the same and just make it look a little different?To once and for all put the conspiracy theories to the rest::::::::..(or not..)Sneakernews.com""The reason for this midsole reprising its role is that Russell Westbrook and Jordan Brand’s other key athletes didn’t want it to change at all, and the Flight Plate technology on the XX9 was in fact widely lauded as one of the best cushioning designs ever and shelving it already might’ve been somewhat of a waste"".
If you thought there was any other reason then you need to jump off a bridge.
I agree. I thought the price increases was due to the new technology being used. Well this shoe is $20 cheaper then last years. So it really does expose the retro prices. What it says is that retros using much older and cheaper technology does not warrant a 220 dollar price tag. It just shows us that Nike and Jordan Brand capitalized off of high demand and jacked the prices up on retros.
That toe absolutely kills that shoe :x
Refuse to believe these are the air jordan 30
not just the retro pricing but pricing in general. they always have. let's be honest there is no sig that costs more than a few cents to a couple dollars at most more to make than the average team bball shoe, and yet they cost like $50-100 more. Historically almost every sig has brought a new price tier. I guess they felt like they just couldn't with this one either because it's so similar or because of the other selling patterns atm with retros. We've seen a rare trend of price reduction with these last 2 sigs but I guarantee they will start increasing it again. maybe they will hype the hell out of the 31 and jump back up to $250, or maybe they wait a year or 2. $200 is still ridiculous imo but it's a lot better than $250 like the 28.... an ugly boot shroud is not worth 50 bucks more....def, they been gassing the retro pricing the last few years n a $200 msrp for their sig shoe really, undeniably exposes that
..n I gotta wonder if that printed toe tech. will avoid cracking