- 37,820
- 15,615
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
Been knew about this, but I'm excited to see this in the theater
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
one guy testified that that Nate was on top of her and she wasn't moving...
and when you do that you run the risk of this happening to you.
but if you have sex with people who CAN give active consent, you don't have to worry about catching charges.
source?
Exactly.but if you have sex with people who CAN give active consent, you don't have to worry about catching charges.
How do you know she didn't give consent? Everything you've posted has been an assumption. There were supposedly 4 ppl in the room, 2 say one thing, 2 say another...What would lead you to take her side as more credible than Parker's when there's no proof AND PARKER BEAT THE CASE? Girl obviously not wrapped too tight, she tried to off herself on multiple occasions until she finally succeeded 12 years after the alleged crime took place. And y'all somehow blame Parker for that as well. Its crazy how you're guilty even when cleared of charges when its a rape allegation. Y'all need to show more discretion when just throwing out that "rapist" title, it doesn't get any lower than that so if you wanna put that on somebody, you need to be absolutely sure of what you're talking about.
Don't see the irony.Truly ironic.
The same cats that talk about the inability of the black man to get justice in America are the ones who defend Nate Parker on the grounds that he was acquitted in a court of law.
fact is he had sex with a women under dubious circumstances, circumstances bad enough that she committed suicide. bad enough she pressed charges. bad enough witness testified Nate was hitting it and she wasn't moving.
.
Mannnnn, no one saw this coming when he sold the movie to Fox? I didn't know it would be rape, but I knew it would be something.
It's crazy how bad this was handled man.
As it turns out you can't have sex with an unconscious woman who subsequently commits suicide and then releases a movie without having to answer for it.
Crazy that his co defendant was a co-writer on the film, and the film apparently got a rape scene in it,
and you that it ws going to be all good when you realeased it.?
It's clear whats about to happen.
-no oscar; no matter how good it is.
-no wide release
-nate parker won't be directing anything other than independent film if he's lucky
It's unfortunate it had to be this movie, but Nate Parker gotta take that L.
It's additionally crazy seeing people like Osh post **** like this :
fact is he had sex with a women under dubious circumstances, circumstances bad enough that she committed suicide. bad enough she pressed charges. bad enough witness testified Nate was hitting it and she wasn't moving.
.
It's one thing to say you don't think it's a good idea to have "sex with drunk women" (which is patronizing and takes all agency away from women, but that's another story).....but to DIRECTLY correlate Nate's situation with the girls suicide is ABSURD. And I've been seeing a lot of this.
This is a girl that struggled most of her life, in and out of Foster homes...that's tried suicide before. Who knows what led her to that point. Especially 12 whole years later.
That's such a careless assumption based on no actual "FACTS". The "FACTS".
Y'all are painting the man as a sinister rapist based soley on allegations...that didn't hold up in the court of law. That's wrong. Imagine if dude is truly innocent...just for one second.
The irony is that on the one hand, some have zero faith in U.S. legal institutions; courts of law and the agents of the carceral state are seen as morally bankrupt. On the other hand, those same folks highlight the decision to acquit Nate Parker as confirmation of his innocence.Don't see the irony.
Did Nate, a black man in America, not get justice by being acquitted?
The irony is that on the one hand, some have zero faith in U.S. legal institutions; courts of law and the agents of the carceral state are seen as morally bankrupt. On the other hand, those same folks highlight the decision to acquit Nate Parker as confirmation of his innocence.Don't see the irony.
Did Nate, a black man in America, not get justice by being acquitted?
but if you have sex with people who CAN give active consent, you don't have to worry about catching charges.
It's additionally crazy seeing people like Osh post **** like this :
It's one thing to say you don't think it's a good idea to have "sex with drunk women" (which is patronizing and takes all agency away from women, but that's another story).....but to DIRECTLY correlate Nate's situation with the girls suicide is ABSURD. And I've been seeing a lot of this.
This is a girl that struggled most of her life, in and out of Foster homes...that's tried suicide before. Who knows what led her to that point. Especially 12 whole years later.
That's such a careless assumption based on no actual "FACTS". The "FACTS".
Y'all are painting the man as a sinister rapist based soley on allegations...that didn't hold up in the court of law. That's wrong. Imagine if dude is truly innocent...just for one second.
I'm not out here saying Nate Parker is danger to the public,
I disagree. You can still catch a charge even with "consent" because nobody was there to know what exactly was said or happened. Its crazy cuz this happened to my roommate at PSU too.
It's not a comparison. The point is to highlight just a few of the many inconsistencies that people throw out to defend rapist, rape culture, and patriarchy more generally.This is a really bad comparison, either stop trying to make it happen or relay it better. Y'all carry on though.
and?
not having sex with a drunk women will dramatically reduce the chances of you catching a SA charge,
I don't understand how your "that one thing that happened to that one roommate" invalidates the value of this advice.
also women rarely report false rape charges.
Dude who posted the testimony from the guy... How did you gather she was unconscious from that? The guy stated that the girl wasn't even drunk and on top of that said the room was dim and only lit with a small blue light. So he didn't see her move but it's not like he had a clear visual. But anyway dude said the girl wasn't drunk from what he saw, so how she end up unconscious? She left the living room went to mates room on her own and they heard and saw them having consensual sex... And then she ends up unconscious?? Huh??
Yeah they dug pretty far huhMannnnn, no one saw this coming when he sold the movie to Fox? I didn't know it would be rape, but I knew it would be something.
They dug til they found something. Being famous is a gift and a curse.
I never had a woman ask me who, what, when, where, and why after smashing. I didn't live college the right way I should've went to PSU.Again, the testimony is just HIS version of the events. It's not the indisputable word of god. Nobody should be using it as some sort of facts factory. It's not.