BMW M5 by G-Power..(Pics)

[ghettokamel1]

Dope Car...

Specifications[table][tr][td] [table][tr][td]Engine[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Type:[/td] [td]Supercharged V10[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Displacement cu in (cc):[/td] [td]301 (4941)[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Power bhp (kW) at RPM:[/td] [td]730(537) / 7500-8200[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM:[/td] [td]517(700) / 7200[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Redline at RPM:[/td] [td]n.a.[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Brakes & Tires[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Brakes F/R:[/td] [td]ABS, vented disc/vented disc[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Tires F-R:[/td] [td]255/30 ZR21 - 295/25 ZR21[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Driveline:[/td] [td]Rear Wheel Drive[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Exterior Dimensions & Weight[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Length × Width × Height in:[/td] [td]n.a.[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Weight lb (kg):[/td] [td]n.a.[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Performance[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Acceleration 0-60 mph s:[/td] [td]4.1[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Top Speed mph (km/h):[/td] [td]211 (340)[/td] [/tr][tr][td]Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km):[/td] [td]n.a.[/td] [/tr][/table][/td] [/tr][/table]
Base Price: 2008 BMW M5 by G-Power - 240,000 € (last update: 1/3/200

 

[the pga tour]

that looks mean!

 

[iceman3699]

looks like a car in GTA or Saints Row...I'd take a regular M5 over that.

 

[heshua]

Warrenty? Reliability? Nevermind those things. I suppose if you can afford to make your M5 forced induction, repairs are a non issue. It took balls to do thatnone the less.

 

[bruza]

i didn't read the specs but aesthetically that thing is ugly as hell.

 

[youngdipset20]

Wow those wheels are horrible

 

[ghettokamel1]

PERSONALLY...i think it's ugly...

 

[jordanxi45]

CLEAN.

 

[soleaddict34]

Originally Posted by Youngdipset20

Wow those wheels are horrible

yeah, i think it'd look much better with different wheels.

 

[drunken cow]

wow....looks stock..

 

[nachobroadweezy]

ugly, only design I like is the engine

 

[npa07]

smh at all the heat if someone gave that too you guys, you wouldnt push it? LMAO

 

[touch money]

Originally Posted by npa07

smh at all the heat if someone gave that too you guys, you wouldnt push it? LMAO

Aintnobody even saying that, they are all saying it is ugly which it is.

 

[r33p04s]

It's ugly and that AMG style front bumper doesn't help at all.

 

[drjordanfreak88]

?this car is ******ed. why make it look more sedated than its original aggressive look when its supposed to be souped up version? the wheels aren't evenreally sporty either. this car is a fail, but i'd still drive it.

 

[youngdipset20]

Originally Posted by DRJordanFreak88

?this car is ******ed. why make it look more sedated than its original aggressive look when its supposed to be souped up version? the wheels aren't even really sporty either. this car is a fail, but i'd still drive it.

All it really needs is some better wheels..and maybe some suspension

 

[coolnificent]

copped when that tax check comes in

 

[lurkin2long]

Originally Posted by bruza

i didn't read the specs but aesthetically that thing is ugly as hell.

youre buggin hard, yea an VOLVO Rs look better right?

 

[jackiechizzan]

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad (in a good way).

 

[apocalypz]

Originally Posted by NachoBroadway

ugly, only design I like is the engine

co-sign. The specs are nice though.

 

[yarrh]

the badges on the back and the rims are pathetic. so does the colorway. so ugly

 

[the pga tour]

Originally Posted by TOUCH MONEY

Originally Posted by npa07

smh at all the heat if someone gave that too you guys, you wouldnt push it? LMAO

Aint nobody even saying that, they are all saying it is ugly which it is.

Riiiiiiigghht.

 

[kash55]

hmm...those badges make it look cheap

 

[ucbearcats27]

IMO, it looks better than what the other tuning companies have done.

But, I don't like the "in your face" styling they usually do and love the "under the radar" look. If that makes sense.

 

[ac4three]

I guess it's alright...