Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What does that even mean?
nahNT hates FOX in general.
No. I think he is just an average director that sucks at story telling but is pretty good with visuals so he intentionally makes half baked movies....He did it to himself.
You believe he intentionally makes revolutionary movies that divide people?
This is not how I form my opinion on directors.Just as plain eye candy he's a strong B+
I judge all directors on the studio release. That's the version that is supposed to be the best.I will judge him by the ultimate cut of BvS in UHD with HDR
Nah. Outside of their marvel movies Fox studios makes good movies for the most part.NT hates FOX in general.
No. I think he is just an average director that sucks at story telling but is pretty good with visuals so he intentionally makes half baked movies.
This is not how I form my opinion on directors.
I judge all directors on the studio release. That's the version that is supposed to be the best.
The quality of this movie is consistent with past Snyder flicks so there's no reason for me to believe a 3 he version would be better.
This movie was bad enough for me that I have no desire to see a longer cut or the regular version itself barring Batfflexk scenes.
Still haven't seen the Watchmen Director's cut; might peep that today
Nah. Outside of their marvel movies Fox studios makes good movies for the most part.NT hates FOX in general.
Their other comic flicks are pretty.good.like Kingsmen: Secret Service.
It does usually but there weren't any huge reports about BvS being bad cuz of studio interference.studio interference doesn't play a part in this?
In general it does and I already explained why when I talked about what things the director is in charge of but that's not blaming it all on Snyder. This is no doubt another WB/DC bad movie. They should've never went with a Snyder/Goyer combo to start. Snyder really is clearly not the guy you pick to do a Superman movie let alone helm what's suppose to be your big team franchise.Because arriving to your logic everything falls on Zach.
This is an excuse. Same **** I hear when the Daredevil movie is trashed.But if you look in the past Watchmen was the same entity. The theater release was a good movie. But Zach's intended directors cut was a much better movie. Heck, it's in one of my top 10 CBM's.
I watched the movie. I didn't like it. I didn't like it for some of the same reasons I didn't like past Snyder movies.If you have no desire to was the the 3 hour cut, cool. But I don't think your looking at this objectively
It does usually but there weren't any huge reports about BvS being bad cuz of studio interference.
The movie isn't good just like the rest of his movies. Are you telling me the majority of his movies suffer from studio interference?
In general it does and I already explained why when I talked about what things the director is in charge of but that's not blaming it all on Snyder. This is no doubt another WB/DC bad movie. They should've never went with a Snyder/Goyer combo to start. Snyder really is clearly not the guy you pick to do a Superman movie let alone helm what's suppose to be your big team franchise.
I watched the movie. I didn't like it. I didn't like it for some of the same reasons I didn't like past Snyder movies.
Telling me I'm not being objective about my opinion on a movie and director because I won't pay to watch a longer version of a movie I didn't like is bull ****.
Exactly what part of this post is opinion?It does usually but there weren't any huge reports about BvS being bad cuz of studio interference.
The movie isn't good just like the rest of his movies. Are you telling me the majority of his movies suffer from studio interference?
Again , your opinion.
Another Zack Snyder movie I didn't like. It really doesn't matter what movie of his you used as an example.I don't know about the rest but I cited Watchmen as an example.
How exactly? Where was this stated? As a fact?Studio interference played a part in the quality of that film.
The movie is terrible.As did Daredevil.
It is an excuse. That's a fact.Now, you may think it's an excuse but it's a fact.
Isn't this literally you just stating your opinion?The directors cut for both movies are miles better than the theater release.
Why would you think I'd care about this? This is just you trying to support your opinion with a claim you can not prove anyway.Ask any CBM fan and I bet the majority would agree.
Looking at his past movies he wasn't the right choice. That's how.How is Snyder not the right guy to helm a superman movie?
You must be late to the party when it comes to my opinion of MOS.You speak as if MOS was a disaster.
Cuz Bryan Singer is a pretty bad director. Best movie he ever did was The Usual Suspects.If the complaint against him is that he doesn't understand superman, then why was Superman Returns a failure as a movie?
See now all you're doing here is talking about a completely other movie and director based off an argument YOU provided.Because essentially it's a continuation of the Donner version of Superman. The classic boyscout. Snyder's version is a more world weary realistic take on supes. So I don't see that claim holding any weight.
When you told me I wasn't being objective because I'm not going to bother watching a longer version of a movie I don't like.Where did I call into question your opinion of this movie?
So exactly what don't you understand? Why ask me questions you know the answers too? Why bring up Superman Returns?At this point the whole world knows you didn't like BVS .
Your rebuttal is tantamount to bull **** though.I was giving a rebuttal
That's based off of me watching the majority of Snyder's movies.your statement that Snyder isn't a good director.
Exactly what criteria is needed to determine if a director makes bad movies? When did you become an expert on this?I called into question your criteria for arriving at that decision.
I've stated repeatedly the theatrical version should always be the best version. Just because the director makes his own version doesn't mean it needs to be watched.You stated that the cut of BVS shown in theaters should have been the best cut.
I replied to somebody saying he's judging Snyder on his longer cut. I told him the same thing I just told you. This is after I told you that Snyder did it to himself when you were shaking your head at all of the Snyder hate.You replied to someone who stated that they will reserve judgements of Snyder's vision until the directors cut of this movie comes out. All I did was respond to that.
Probably gonna be half that for a while as long as Snyder is around directing.I thought this was the DCEU thread. I didn't know it was the Zack Snyder thread.
The same guy that made up the SS rumors that turned out to be false?