- 93,956
- 32,974
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
Stop showing off bruh! I’m sick of it10.5 1985s vs 11 2016
Jordan 1 OG HIGH “CHICAGO” - NOT HAPPENING
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
- 24,441
- 22,107
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
Need Royals in 100% OG form.
- 2,267
- 5,926
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2018
The swoosh size difference is quite noticeable.
- 33,399
- 39,100
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
I'm expecting the shape to be like those terrible black/red Defiant's. I hope I'm wrong.
- 681
- 402
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2013
Just out of curiosity, was there anything off on the 2017 Royals? Just wondering...
- 6,028
- 14,983
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
Tumbling and QC inconsistencies.
- 8,799
- 10,384
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
If history serves us right we should be seeing a fragment in the new cut before anything
- 8,799
- 10,384
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
And trash leather on some parts. And glitter
- 6,028
- 14,983
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
So...QC inconsistencies? Also, the leather on my pair is great
I lucked out. No glitter too.
- 6,028
- 14,983
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
Wait, what?! How do you figure that?
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,313
- 47,542
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2004
Finally I will have a pair of Chicagos.. for the 4th time. 
- 8,799
- 10,384
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
Thats what happened 5 years ago
- 8,799
- 10,384
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
Its already been 5 years holy ****
- 6,028
- 14,983
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
Yeah but what makes you think they'd use fragment again? lol they already rolled out the new mold with the red stripe defiants earlier this year. You're talking out your a**, man. I'm almost 99% sure jordan 1 drags was just the one time deal and the creator is on to other models. If it's for the chicago 1 than I highly doubt they'd slap the frag logo on it just because.
- 8,799
- 10,384
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2015
I was half kidding about new frags but also kind of serious when i think about it.
No way is the defiant the new mold. Why are people saying that?
- 6,028
- 14,983
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2015
Defiant isnt the 85 molded pairs but it is the new mold. It was confirmed by DJ Folk when he dropped off in the Jordan 1 thread a month or two back. He also said 175 price increase is about to be the norm for all 1s as well while 190 will be for the 85' remasters.
- 792
- 407
- Joined
- May 10, 2014
In for the L
- 9,633
- 5,212
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
these will be bought
- 80
- 34
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
so these chicagos boutta be 190 and supposedly more faithful to the OG 1985.....I'm so in if true
- 9,823
- 10,178
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
Would sell my 2015's now but can't risk it in case they do something weird or gimmicky to them.
dhtowng
Supporter
- 9,699
- 19,913
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
Wouldn’t dare sell my 2015 in lieu of these. That’s crazy. 2015s are too good. I’ll just have both. Not like there’s much to be improved upon. They nailed it pretty good on the last version for me.
Last edited:
- 12,844
- 11,020
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
Exactly. Unless you are hard sought for the cash, holding the 2015s is the smart move right now.
- 12,844
- 11,020
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
It’s wild to me that in less than 10 years, the retail price for OG 1s will have went from $130 to $190.
F**k you, JB for this.
- 14,527
- 19,150
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
Yeah JB not scamming me again. If these turn out looking very close to the OGs, I would only rebuy these, breds, and Royals. MAYBE blacktoes. The other 15 or so pair of 1s I own are completely fine in the remastered mold.
- 5,407
- 3,444
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2005
Exact boat I’m in. Throwing a clear sole on or some BS. That for sale post ain’t happening till I know more about 2020
