LC/PC OG 4's
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by nikemax,
- Start date
- 1,668
- 822
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
those are legit and oh so clean. at least $600 in that condition, maybe more cuz of the rarity. i wish i had them!
- 850
- 77
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
looks legit but wow those are in really good condition.
- 250
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
The stitching on those things is HORRIBLE. Look at that. It looks like a kid sewed them.
- 1,529
- 10
- Joined
- May 10, 2006
legit, could hit $1000 on ebay with the right buyer. But that leather is so much thicker and nicer than the retros
- 1,604
- 146
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
fakes, they are very good fakes though..cut of the shoe is off, stitching is very bad. that production number is non exsiting also, so def fakes stayaway..
- 1,006
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
that exact pair went on ebay for around $85 a week or two ago....i was watching em end, but i really wasnt sure of authenticity so i didnt pull the trigger
*EDIT* still have the link
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...tem&item=120369098989
*EDIT* still have the link
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...tem&item=120369098989
- 4,082
- 12
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
i second that 1. the height is to high 2. the netting is supost to be parrallel 3. the wing looks alil high http://www.sneakerfiles.c...ire-reds-white-red-black/
- 12,183
- 5,804
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
cant say fake yet.
but then look at the heel on the picture that the poster posted and compare it to this pic. fakes have the heel part flat, but these dont
i advise you guys not to compare to air-jordans when it comes to the military 4s and the fire red 4s. they are fake. the rest of the shoes on that website arereal
( some samples that they have posted are customized as well)
but then look at the heel on the picture that the poster posted and compare it to this pic. fakes have the heel part flat, but these dont
i advise you guys not to compare to air-jordans when it comes to the military 4s and the fire red 4s. they are fake. the rest of the shoes on that website arereal
( some samples that they have posted are customized as well)
- 250
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
They're fake.
The stitching is absolutely below standard.
If that isn't enough, the netting should be parallel to the wing.
If that isn't enough, the netting scale is too big.
Do you really think hardcore OG collectors would've let them only fetch $85.00 on ebay?
The stitching is absolutely below standard.
If that isn't enough, the netting should be parallel to the wing.
If that isn't enough, the netting scale is too big.
Do you really think hardcore OG collectors would've let them only fetch $85.00 on ebay?
- 1,561
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2007
Legit?? Really?
Netting is way too big. It's not even close to the horrible looking retro.
Netting is way too big. It's not even close to the horrible looking retro.
- 704
- 14
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
G... once again ur wrong...OG quality is 10 times better than that of a retro, and those are hard to find in that condition, so i'd say around 1000
- 8,306
- 725
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
You know these are fake right?
Just look at the mesh netting
- 704
- 14
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
Basically i was stating that even if fake they still look and have better quality than retros
- 312
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2008
wow, this is one of the toughest one to spot of they fake or not. Its very unlikely that such an old pair of fakes have been lying around in peoples closets.Sometime or another someone had to tell the owner those were fake(if they are fake) and they wouldnt have lasted on this planet that long.
Product # 890204 FT2 did not exist for that CW or any other CW for that matter in the IV's. FT1 Yes FT2 no. So im going with fake on these.
Product # 890204 FT2 did not exist for that CW or any other CW for that matter in the IV's. FT1 Yes FT2 no. So im going with fake on these.
- 8,306
- 725
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
Ouch
- 250
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
Sick Kikz wrote:
"G... once again ur wrong...OG quality is 10 times better than that of a retro, and those are hard to find in that condition, so i'd say around1000"
If you have no clue what you're talking about, please ST FU.
"G... once again ur wrong...OG quality is 10 times better than that of a retro, and those are hard to find in that condition, so i'd say around1000"
If you have no clue what you're talking about, please ST FU.
- 527
- 156
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
fake! the top of the tongue is so crooked and looks like it has been butchered. the jumpman tag on the tongue is way to high .
yes i know im smart and your welcome! i seriously hope you didnt pay $280 lolz
yes i know im smart and your welcome! i seriously hope you didnt pay $280 lolz
- 1,006
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
"architect" knows his sh-t about jordans, im going to cosign him on this one
- 250
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
^^ Thanks Kearse. Much appreciated.
- 250
- 80
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
They aren't mine but here is a link to what authentic OG IVs should look like...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120373868708&indexURL=0&photoDisplayType=2http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...=0&photoDisplayType=2
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120373868708&indexURL=0&photoDisplayType=2http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...=0&photoDisplayType=2
- 1,561
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2007
First of all, DO NOT POST LINKS TO LIVE AUCTIONS.
Second of all, they are fakes.
Netting holes are way too big. Netting surface area is way too small.
Ankle support should be a little higher.
Tongue is too short.
Lastly, THESE ARE HORRIBLE LOOKING FAKES, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO THE HORRIBLE LOOKING RECENT RETROS.
Second of all, they are fakes.
Netting holes are way too big. Netting surface area is way too small.
Ankle support should be a little higher.
Tongue is too short.
Lastly, THESE ARE HORRIBLE LOOKING FAKES, NOT EVEN CLOSE TO THE HORRIBLE LOOKING RECENT RETROS.
