- 3,412
- 163
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
Quality thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You are so out of touch with the world that you can't even comprehend why someone would buy a pair of shoes for themselves first.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
What bothers me is how much people CLAIM what others think of them doesn't matter. Just about anything we do outside of making sure we eat, drink, sleep, and have transportation can be traced back to pleasing others. No need to deny it to make yourself seem like this self-pleasing individual.
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
So you're going to generalize all collections based on interviews of Henzo, NinjaHood? Henzo, NinjaHood? Yeah, okay.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Winged Wheel
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
This is my first time hearing this claim. Couldn't disagree more with your opinion.
Go look at the 3 NT interviews posted on here. Henzo, NinjaHood, and the other random do. All 3 start off telling how the get that rush when other dudes comment on their shoes and the amount of attention they got from it.
So what is the point of collecting? Collections, IMO, are meant to show off. That is the #1 reason to collect. To brag, to collect, to tell the world about. It isn't a self-fulfilling act.
I will wait.
You are so out of touch with the world that you can't even comprehend why someone would buy a pair of shoes for themselves first.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
What bothers me is how much people CLAIM what others think of them doesn't matter. Just about anything we do outside of making sure we eat, drink, sleep, and have transportation can be traced back to pleasing others. No need to deny it to make yourself seem like this self-pleasing individual.
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
So you're going to generalize all collections based on interviews of Henzo, NinjaHood? Henzo, NinjaHood? Yeah, okay.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Winged Wheel
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
This is my first time hearing this claim. Couldn't disagree more with your opinion.
Go look at the 3 NT interviews posted on here. Henzo, NinjaHood, and the other random do. All 3 start off telling how the get that rush when other dudes comment on their shoes and the amount of attention they got from it.
So what is the point of collecting? Collections, IMO, are meant to show off. That is the #1 reason to collect. To brag, to collect, to tell the world about. It isn't a self-fulfilling act.
I will wait.
True confidence comes from the inside. If you allow other influences (people, media, pop culture) to dictate how confident you are, then you also allow them to take it away.Originally Posted by GrimlocK
Alot of good insightful things being posted right now...I just wanna add a couple more things into this thought train:
I don't think I touched on this in my initial post but it was somewhat touched on by a couple of the above posters...I feel like we need to differentiate and separate what we need to do for ourselves versus what we need to do for others.
And all this really boils down to is happiness, doesn't it? But in order for us to know what happiness feels like we need to know what it's like to not be happy...how they usually say " you don't know what you've got until it's gone" or " you don't know what you have until the well runs dry"
They say confidence is the key to getting what you want out of this world...women, status..etc. But does confidence stem from the inside out or the outside in? Right now I feel like saying its both. You need to be both positive and firm that who you are, your character speaks volumes about what you've been through and what you have learned...but at the same time I would absolutely be lying if I said that I didn't like a nice pair of clean chucks or tennis sneakers in the summer to make me feel even better. Why? Was I "brainwashed" into thinking this by ads and t.v. that I needed a clean pair of kicks to feel better about myself? Possibly...but it's so far back that I couldn't tell you if something like that happened. But what I do know is what I feel in this present moment...and what I feel is an affinity towards clean sneakers.
But relating this to my original post...does this relate to me appeasing myself through appeasing other individuals with my clean sneakers so they have a better impression of me? Am I placing my control in external forces/objects/people? Truthfully speaking I would again say both...i'd be lying to say that the product of me liking to wear new/clean kicks while making me feel better does also increase my happiness if I do get a positive comment about them from others...
True confidence comes from the inside. If you allow other influences (people, media, pop culture) to dictate how confident you are, then you also allow them to take it away.Originally Posted by GrimlocK
Alot of good insightful things being posted right now...I just wanna add a couple more things into this thought train:
I don't think I touched on this in my initial post but it was somewhat touched on by a couple of the above posters...I feel like we need to differentiate and separate what we need to do for ourselves versus what we need to do for others.
And all this really boils down to is happiness, doesn't it? But in order for us to know what happiness feels like we need to know what it's like to not be happy...how they usually say " you don't know what you've got until it's gone" or " you don't know what you have until the well runs dry"
They say confidence is the key to getting what you want out of this world...women, status..etc. But does confidence stem from the inside out or the outside in? Right now I feel like saying its both. You need to be both positive and firm that who you are, your character speaks volumes about what you've been through and what you have learned...but at the same time I would absolutely be lying if I said that I didn't like a nice pair of clean chucks or tennis sneakers in the summer to make me feel even better. Why? Was I "brainwashed" into thinking this by ads and t.v. that I needed a clean pair of kicks to feel better about myself? Possibly...but it's so far back that I couldn't tell you if something like that happened. But what I do know is what I feel in this present moment...and what I feel is an affinity towards clean sneakers.
But relating this to my original post...does this relate to me appeasing myself through appeasing other individuals with my clean sneakers so they have a better impression of me? Am I placing my control in external forces/objects/people? Truthfully speaking I would again say both...i'd be lying to say that the product of me liking to wear new/clean kicks while making me feel better does also increase my happiness if I do get a positive comment about them from others...
belief in oneself and one's powers or abilities; self-confidence; self-reliance; assurance: His lack of confidence defeated him.
So meaning unless you see how others operation and how skilled, intelligent, determined, etc, others are, you can't really BELIEVE that what you posses is top notch. So again, I view confidence as a world relative trait that is acquired through experience and exposure of situations and other people.
belief in oneself and one's powers or abilities; self-confidence; self-reliance; assurance: His lack of confidence defeated him.
So meaning unless you see how others operation and how skilled, intelligent, determined, etc, others are, you can't really BELIEVE that what you posses is top notch. So again, I view confidence as a world relative trait that is acquired through experience and exposure of situations and other people.
Which is why "doing you" doesn't make sense to me because YOU don't naturally do anything. You take everything you have seen in this world (Other people) and determine (consciously or subconsciously) what you will mimic and what you won't mimic. So there is essentially no such thing as "doing me."Originally Posted by Jking0821
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Which is why "doing you" doesn't make sense to me because YOU don't naturally do anything. You take everything you have seen in this world (Other people) and determine (consciously or subconsciously) what you will mimic and what you won't mimic. So there is essentially no such thing as "doing me."Originally Posted by Jking0821
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Completely agree with youOriginally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Which is why "doing you" doesn't make sense to me because YOU don't naturally do anything. You take everything you have seen in this world (Other people) and determine (consciously or subconsciously) what you will mimic and what you won't mimic. So there is essentially no such thing as "doing me."Originally Posted by Jking0821
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Completely agree with youOriginally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Which is why "doing you" doesn't make sense to me because YOU don't naturally do anything. You take everything you have seen in this world (Other people) and determine (consciously or subconsciously) what you will mimic and what you won't mimic. So there is essentially no such thing as "doing me."Originally Posted by Jking0821
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Well in this example it isn't really circular...or not so on a deeper level. In this example what makes you happy is getting looks from the homie's based on what heat your wearing. Take away the homies and you have nothing.Originally Posted by Jking0821
This whole argument is circular.
Let's say i buy shoes to impress guys. Well that makes me feel good having something in common with other people ie: sneakers, and i get a confidence boost when people check out my shoes. So this in turn makes me happy. And isn't "doing you" doing what truly makes you happy? So am i really doing it just for others or am i doing it for me?
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Well in this example it isn't really circular...or not so on a deeper level. In this example what makes you happy is getting looks from the homie's based on what heat your wearing. Take away the homies and you have nothing.Originally Posted by Jking0821
This whole argument is circular.
Let's say i buy shoes to impress guys. Well that makes me feel good having something in common with other people ie: sneakers, and i get a confidence boost when people check out my shoes. So this in turn makes me happy. And isn't "doing you" doing what truly makes you happy? So am i really doing it just for others or am i doing it for me?
I like to think about "doing you" in the sense of if there was no one else on earth and it was only me 0 other people what would i do? But the point of being alive is to intercommunicate with other humans. So if you need a material object to do that it is kind of key to living a fulfilling happy life
I think about this stuff but i always come out to the same conclusion....there is no conclusion.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Winged Wheel
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
This is my first time hearing this claim. Couldn't disagree more with your opinion.
Go look at the 3 NT interviews posted on here. Henzo, NinjaHood, and the other random do. All 3 start off telling how the get that rush when other dudes comment on their shoes and the amount of attention they got from it.
So what is the point of collecting? Collections, IMO, are meant to show off. That is the #1 reason to collect. To brag, to collect, to tell the world about. It isn't a self-fulfilling act.
I will wait.
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Winged Wheel
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
I mean, I hate to keep bringing it up, the basis of shoe lovers is to impress other men with your shoes. That isn't a self-pleasing hobby.
This is my first time hearing this claim. Couldn't disagree more with your opinion.
Go look at the 3 NT interviews posted on here. Henzo, NinjaHood, and the other random do. All 3 start off telling how the get that rush when other dudes comment on their shoes and the amount of attention they got from it.
So what is the point of collecting? Collections, IMO, are meant to show off. That is the #1 reason to collect. To brag, to collect, to tell the world about. It isn't a self-fulfilling act.
I will wait.