My boy is marrying a jumpoff....that i passed to him, and.....swapping, salad tossing+ period sex?

[stay lurkin]

Originally Posted by CJ616

F- execution. There's no reason for me to be "mad" about that.

obviously you are not really mad 

 

[jesusshuttlesworth34]

I situations like this I just utter...."To each their own..." and move on. 

A lot of folks didn't get the point of this topic. 

One man's trash is another's treasure apparently. 

I would not attend a wedding or stir up something like that.  Some things are better left unsaid.  If you want to attend the wedding and support your friend cool, but if you have a notion that things will go South, you are better off not even wasting your energy attending that. 

 

[tr1ll]

Originally Posted by Stay Lurkin

Originally Posted by CJ616

F- execution. There's no reason for me to be "mad" about that.

obviously you are not really mad 

I thought it was funny and on point.

 

[All Ready]

alotta SSA members here

 

[pepper]

“Marrying a girl with the understanding that she's been with other people...is not the same as marrying a girl knowing for a fact that she was YOUR friends side piece.

 

[oidreez]

I'm sure the dude marrying the girl cares what NT thinks of the whole situation. The only thing is that the girl doesnt know the OP passed her along to the friend just to smash. OP just be happy for them. What are you gonna do, be like "oh how's my old jumpoff doing"?.

 

[illoquent aka dsk]

EDIT: Actually %$#% it...not worth one of you +@*#!% catching feelings.

LMAO at that post up there. *Shaq face*

 

[dior paint]

Originally Posted by Pepper

“Marrying a girl with the understanding that she's been with other people...is not the same as marrying a girl knowing for a fact that she was YOUR friends side piece.

 

[pepper]

Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT

Originally Posted by Pepper

“Marrying a girl with the understanding that she's been with other people...is not the same as marrying a girl knowing for a fact that she was YOUR friends side piece.

 

[dior paint]

Now that's just flat out gay.

 

[pepper]

but I have a vagina though

 

[dior paint]

Well...you down for the trizzy then?

 

[shoefreakbaby]

Pepper dont waste your time.

If women were as picky as men were, less than 10 people a year would be getting married a year

 

[too steez]

She is not "bad."

 

[illoquent aka dsk]

Chill B.

 

[pepper]

Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT

Well...you down for the trizzy then?

Shut the hell up.

 

[shoefreakbaby]

Originally Posted by Too Steez

She is not "bad."

To him......... she is

 

[dior paint]

Originally Posted by shoefreakbaby

Pepper dont waste your time.

If women were as picky as men were, less than 10 people a year would be getting married a year

You stay cheerleading for bops in threads like these.
Ya'll really do stick up for each other.

 

[pepper]

Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT

Originally Posted by shoefreakbaby

Pepper dont waste your time.

If women were as picky as men were, less than 10 people a year would be getting married a year

You stay cheerleading for bops in threads like these.
Ya'll really do stick up for each other.

It isn't about "sticking up" for any one. It's about double standards and how they're applied in almost every situation.
The reason behind my original post, pseudo relationship expert, is that the OP was trying to make this young woman seem sketchy and filthy, when in reality..he is.
And it makes you wonder, if he was up in the buns for a year, at some point or another he caught feelings. He probably won't ever admit it to a forum or himself for that matter.
I'm not saying that what she did was morally acceptable (Again, just my opinion), but don't come up on this website creating a thread about the girl, makes you look like a hypocrite.

 

[dior paint]

How did he make her seem sketchy and filthy? He most certainly didn't. You just took offense to her being a sidechick in this situation because the primary subject of his post was HIS FRIEND. How is that even refutable?

And since you trying to play this double standard card (which alot of bops like to pull out)...would you marry a man that you know used to have his face sat on by one of your girlfriends?

Oh...let me guess...if he "invigorates your senses" then yes right?

 

[shoefreakbaby]

Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT

Originally Posted by shoefreakbaby

Pepper dont waste your time.

If women were as picky as men were, less than 10 people a year would be getting married a year

You stay cheerleading for bops in threads like these.
Ya'll really do stick up for each other.

..... I hope you not calling me a bop, I would hate to press the red button 

everything pepper said and much more 




Sexist bastard 

 

[dior paint]

Originally Posted by shoefreakbaby

Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT

Originally Posted by shoefreakbaby

Pepper dont waste your time.

If women were as picky as men were, less than 10 people a year would be getting married a year

You stay cheerleading for bops in threads like these.
Ya'll really do stick up for each other.

..... I hope you not calling me a bop, I would hate to press the red button 

everything pepper said and much more 




Sexist bastard 

You know how many times I been banned slim? DGAF about no button. 
You can take that report button and shove it up your snatch.

 

[illoquent aka dsk]

Bruh brought the choppa out.

Oh...let me guess...if he "invigorates your senses" then yes right?
%++%+$+ comedy.

 

[CJ616]

 

[|A-Man|]

Originally Posted by Nowitzness41

Originally Posted by MonStar1

Originally Posted by Nowitzness41

This originally was a humble brag thread, a jumpoff to one is a keeper for some other. Did you ever think maybe you were her jumpoff, and now she found somebody she actually likes to be around for more than just casual sex?

 stop steezin

  

 but that explanation makes the most sense to me. Doesnt make his friend any less of a simp, just think about it

How could he be the jumpoff when he was the one with the gf and using her on the side? Are you implying she had a bf and was just using him for sex? Cuz that's just assuming evidence that has not been provided. If you're saying she was just using him for sex until she got in to a serious relationship she's still a JO. It's always just about the sex with a JO. How you trying to flip the script on OP?