- 549
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2007
waste of money in my opinion and these are probably the ugliest sig shoe ever
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
co-sign.Originally Posted by 160jordansdeep
terrible
Originally Posted by greatone33333
better than the 15's, 19's, 21's and 22's maybe even the 18's, 2's, 9's and 14's,
I know you said maybe but def not better than the XVIII's,Originally Posted by greatone33333
better than the 15's, 19's, 21's and 22's maybe even the 18's, 2's, 9's and 14's,
Originally Posted by OnlyRetroXi
Not too much excitement from over here.
Originally Posted by Mac4167
nice pics but still cant bring myself to paying 190 for these, espically to ball in which they were made for because JB def wasnt looking for casual style and looks with this shoe. good pics though
Originally Posted by edunpeal
iam glad they didn't call this AJ XX4 they're