Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread

Best colorway?

  • Black/Red

    Votes: 1,038 44.2%
  • Royal

    Votes: 319 13.6%
  • Chicago

    Votes: 453 19.3%
  • Shadow

    Votes: 175 7.4%
  • Black Toe

    Votes: 237 10.1%
  • UNC

    Votes: 77 3.3%
  • Kentucky

    Votes: 19 0.8%
  • Neutral Grey

    Votes: 32 1.4%

  • Total voters
    2,350
pretty sure they are .... besides the back slope which was incorporated after it became clear the flat back of the 85s put stress on a players Achilles.

EED9C33D-4950-4AD2-8355-5C19509B6351.jpeg

F96A2A3B-EF56-4974-9AF3-EAD01ACC0FE0.gif
 
bro, u gotta let it go. we haven't gotten true highs since the OGs. every retro has been some variation of a mid. I had to come to grips with the fact I was duped. i don't own any actual 1 highs although my shoe boxes say otherwise. we been lied to man.
Sure we haven’t got exactly what we want in terms of 1 to 1 reproductions of the OGs, but I have to disagree with you on the notion that we’ve been getting just mids since the OGs. This first image, courtesy of our own MJO23DAN MJO23DAN , with the OG Chis on the left, ‘94s in the middle, and 2015s on the right, and this second image courtesy of Jumpmanbostic, showing the OGs on the left and the 2015s on the right, show that there’s not much of a difference in terms of height. Like millimeters, if that. Now as to other features, such as shape and outsole, that’s a different convo.
8AB60A47-971A-48C6-8D49-4189F7CD340C.png
9849FA11-3F4C-48C2-9994-34431AC61E48.png
 
bro, u gotta let it go. we haven't gotten true highs since the OGs. every retro has been some variation of a mid. I had to come to grips with the fact I was duped. i don't own any actual 1 highs although my shoe boxes say otherwise. we been lied to man.

Yeah you wrong on this bruh.

We've gotten highs comparable to OG's in terms of height. That was the first thing I checked for when I got my OG's.

In fact, some retros seem higher than the OG.

Obsidians, however, were unusually low compared to others highs.
 
bro, u gotta let it go. we haven't gotten true highs since the OGs. every retro has been some variation of a mid. I had to come to grips with the fact I was duped. i don't own any actual 1 highs although my shoe boxes say otherwise. we been lied to man.
Sure we haven’t got exactly what we want in terms of 1 to 1 reproductions of the OGs, but I have to disagree with you on the notion that we’ve been getting just mids since the OGs. This first image, courtesy of our own MJO23DAN MJO23DAN , with the OG Chis on the left, ‘94s in the middle, and 2015s on the right, and this second image courtesy of Jumpmanbostic, showing the OGs on the left and the 2015s on the right, show that there’s not much of a difference in terms of height. Like millimeters, if that. Now as to other features, such as shape and outsole, that’s a different convo.
8AB60A47-971A-48C6-8D49-4189F7CD340C.png
9849FA11-3F4C-48C2-9994-34431AC61E48.png


Honestly the highs of 01s any 09 high pair and beyond to the 2013-2014 highway and remasters are all high tops. Some just look squattier than others because of padding, shape, materials, wing placement etc. I posted a pic last year comparing the 01 all the way to the remaster pairs and they were all close in height.
 
Back
Top Bottom