1
126006
Guest
I honestly love my 2013 breds. Wouldn’t give them up for anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If anyone try’s to tell you that any shoe is better than the remastered version, they’re full of ****. That 2013 vs 2016 black toe convo a few pages back was cringey and I don’t understand homeboys agenda pushing the 2013s
Just to reiterate, every single remastered version is better than their previous model without exception: bred, royal, shadows,black toes, etc. it’s not debateable
With a few exceptions actually. Banned 2011, 94s...
09 Shadow
Sigh the whole 2013 line of ones are trash smh.
That's why he said previous model fellas
And dudes will whine about millimeter in height, but not talk about a sneaker being tumbled that shouldn't be and is off in it's color.
I guess you dudes will wait until the next remaster to whine about the tumbled leather and say the 2016's are trash.
Same cycle.
sharing a very close up photo of the spider-man , and if you are asking if you should double up, i suggest yes
but if you have chicago already then i think you dont need an extra spider-man ,
i doubled up because i dont have a chicago
do you think a white lace on the spiderman will work?
the WHITE leather is super buttery , the RED leather is almost the same , the BLACK leather is my gripe, it's almost perfect except for that
I honestly love my 2013 breds. Wouldn’t give them up for anything.
I told people don't sleep on the Spidermans
Yeah they’re wild’n. Whoever can’t appreciate the 2013 run clearly wasn’t in to shoes until just recently or just couldn’t get their hands on a pair in 2013. So now that the remastered versions are out, it’s become the cool thing to slander the 2013s. Easy to slander a shoe that you couldn’t copp back in ‘13 even you wanted to. They were so limited at that time. And by the way 2013 Royals ARE better than the remastered version IMO. Oh well to each his own. Love my 2013s as well.
Are the soles yellowed, or is that just the pic? Also were they not covered in glitter? I’m torn between unds’ing my 2013, or selling them off. The whole shoe is literally covered in glitter. Not just small patches like my remastered pairs.
sound like you're projectingExactly, people just repeat what others say now up here in order to show how knowledgeable they are and fit in.
thats because the remastered mold/quality hadnt been introduced for people to know better. People dropping 700+ on 1s regularly still. Quality has never been a factor in resale, we all know thisNobody was saying naw b, don't pay $500 for those royals they're trash. Don't pay $700.
no one said they LOOK garbage - i said they ARE garbage in comparison to the remastered version. You must've been top of your classI still wear all of my 2013's. Dude UNDS the 2013 shadows a couple of pages back. They look garbage to people now
Black toe quality is not great on any version. But chicago’s are no better either. Let not act like these were great quality 1s. It does look awesome tho. Think the shadow 2018 and hyper royal were better. By far.
Best quote to start the new yearSuddenly after SBB everyone became leather experts.
No mine are not that great tbh. Black toe and chicago same quality. Stiff. The bred toes 18 shadow 18 hyper royals all better.You got ‘15 Chi’s? Because the quality was undeniable good on those. Unless you don’t consider soft leather all around to be good quality then I guess I understand where you’re coming from.
No mine are not that great tbh. Black toe and chicago same quality. Stiff. The bred toes 18 shadow 18 hyper royals all better.