- 20,202
- 4,184
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
I think the big Jumpman is cool
The best flagship Jordan design in years
The best flagship Jordan design in years
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Agreed. Years from now the 29's with the big Jumpman will be sought after...I think the big Jumpman is cool
The best flagship Jordan design in years
Agreed. Years from now the 29's with the big Jumpman will be sought after...
last shot 14s oh and maybe even candy cane 14s, and I guarantee when the 16s and 23s are retroed they won't sit the 15s were so bad that the 16s automatically look awesomeI disagree. No Jordan after the 13 is really that sought after.Agreed. Years from now the 29's with the big Jumpman will be sought after...
Its no different than Nike branding on some shoes, the only good xx9s IMHO have been the big jumpman solid upper bcuz that them elephant print trapezoids is horribleLove the shoe itself, but big jumpman plus "23" just brands the shoe too much instead of letting it speak for itself. It should make people think "wow, that's a cool shoe. I wonder what kind it is. Oh it's the newest Jordan flagship." not "wow look at those Jordans. They really couldn't think of anything more original?"
Lol anyway, even if you love the big jumpman, you would have to admit JB isn't making the most of shoe, given the potential with the upper. But who knows, maybe they will. Hope so.
I disagree. No Jordan after the 13 is really that sought after.
I brought my cover prongs on them blackoutsalmost trueI disagree. No Jordan after the 13 is really that sought after.
except for 17s
almost true
except for 17s
my homeboi from champs going for the samething tried to talk me into going in on the pack with him and me taking the XI for $300I might mess around and keep the xx9 n flip the XI
The 'flimsy' feeling that you experiences is to me is what's special about this shoe. It isn't flimsy in a bad sense. It's remarkable how much lockdown and support you get from such a minimal upper. The XX9 provides for me what I was hoping for with the upper of the Kobe 9, plus some increased responsiveness. I'd say court feel is about as good in both shoes -- XX9 traction is great, maybe not quite as good as the kobe 9 but it's good. The cushioning setup will last you much longer in the xx9I love the simplicity of just the Jumpman, No other designs, Just Jordan! I tried these on the day they came out and couldn't bring myself to pay 300$ Canadian for them. They felt flimsy, I kinda wish I had of got them now, since everyone says they are the greatest shoe to play in of all time. I bought 5 pairs of Kobe 9 low and 2 high instead. Kobe 9 vs Jordan 29, which shoe performs better?
I kind of like the gift of flight pair... not completely sold due to the silver colored frame. An on foot look would probably help
exactly. Ive been waiting for a XVII and XVIII retro for way too long.10yrs from now all ajXV-2012 will be wanted.the aj1-14 will all be played out and retroed 5times.
I agree, especially 15-23. I highly doubt 2009 and up will ever be wanted though. those are simply valued only to a very select few obsessed Jordan collectors. The majority of people do not want them for style. They wouldn't have a strong demand for the technology gimmicks either, because every single year they tell you there is some new great thing that's much better (even though it rarely is much different at all). Resellers aren't even interested in those models because of these factors, so where does the real demand come from? Only way those would do well is if they made them extremely limited and even then I don't see much interest10yrs from now all ajXV-2012 will be wanted.the aj1-14 will all be played out and retroed 5times.