- 12,037
- 2,686
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2001
One of these people is bound to kill her.
Official Casey Anthony Trial - Walking Out of Jail a Free Woman @ 12:00am 07/17/2011
One of these people is bound to kill her.
- 9,511
- 524
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
wait.............what
elpablo21
Supporter
- 105,368
- 192,936
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Well isn't this some #+@%
- 11,513
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
Man, this reminds me of that Boondocks episode when R. Kelly got away with peeing on a little girl...
- 30,498
- 5,958
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
Her dad gave NO emotion when she was found innocent... Dude knows....
- 1,247
- 23
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2008
- 2,447
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
excuse my ignorance...
But where is the childs father?
Is he not in the picture??
But where is the childs father?
Is he not in the picture??
- 8,417
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
....umm, okay? im NOT arguing that point smart guy.
I AM ONLY commenting on: "Vick went to jail for a gambling ring, not for killing a dog. When will people get this through their head?"..........thats why i QUOTED IT.
ftr, i agree somewhat on what Cedric Ceballos said. HOWEVER, you do still hear morons saying Vick went to jail for killing dogs then try to compare it to other things when thats not what he went to prison for.
- 3,312
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2000
Why is this surprising? She was acquitted of all the charges that carried longer prison sentences, and convicted of four charges that carried one year each max. So that adds up to 4 years. She's apparently gonna be credited 3.5 for the time she's been in jail since the arrest, so the MOST she could serve going forwards is like 6 months. And that's assuming she is sentenced to the max for each count, which isn't guaranteed.Originally Posted by moundraised23
wait.............what
Reasonable doubt strikes again.
- 1,989
- 105
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
one1 1 1 wrote:
LOL at kim kardshain and her twitter
she is a air head
Kim K out here examining verdicts and $+%+
Can't believe this chick got off though
- 17,121
- 23,262
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
puzzled to why people care so much about this, #%%! like this happens every day........
- 3,312
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2000
You really think a prosecutor in a case with this much media coverage and this sort of fact pattern could have headlined the case with anything but first degree murder? Might have led to more time for the defendant but that was never an option for the prosecutor.
- 11,513
- 51
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
You want a murderer to roam the streets free?
- 4,837
- 215
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
All of you want to convict her. Based on what? The government had all the advantages to wrap this up, unlimited resources, and yet couldn't prove anything. There's isn't a murder weapon, their motive was weak. The Judge was clearly prosecution leaning, every single media outlet was hammering and hammering on the defense (in which I was critical on his approach) for the past month and still couldn't convict her based on the evidence presented.
It's not about what you know, or what you think, it's about what you can prove. Clearly, today showed the government couldn't prove a damn thing.
I think George Anthony was the most disappointed after hearing the verdict.
People care because it's brought to their attention, irregardless of the reasons for it.
This woman will eventually get what she deserved. The case had too many loop holes to be tried, it's almost like they rushed the charges.
Ain't no way I don't believe she didn't have a hand in this. From hiding her original pregnancy, the imaginary friends all the way to club hopping without a care in the world. I hope they find "new evidence" and enter a new charge.
This woman will eventually get what she deserved. The case had too many loop holes to be tried, it's almost like they rushed the charges.
Ain't no way I don't believe she didn't have a hand in this. From hiding her original pregnancy, the imaginary friends all the way to club hopping without a care in the world. I hope they find "new evidence" and enter a new charge.
- 12,037
- 2,686
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2001
No one knows who the father is, as you've heard in the case, she is a BIG %#$##.
- 653
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
thats messed up. i really want to hear what the jury has to say. not even child abuse? -___-
- 33,227
- 12,371
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
Originally Posted by Ghenges
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Fool I am asking why is this one getting the media attention that it is. Of course it is on TV, that is why I am even asking the question.
Because people are interested in it.
late with the response cuz i avoided this thread but http://en.wikipedia.org/w...ing_white_woman_syndrome
- 8,417
- 1,852
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2005
Originally Posted by rashi
All of you want to convict her. Based on what? The government had all the advantages to wrap this up, unlimited resources, and yet couldn't prove anything. There's isn't a murder weapon, their motive was weak. The Judge was clearly prosecution leaning, every single media outlet was hammering and hammering on the defense (in which I was critical on his approach) for the past month and still couldn't convict her based on the evidence presented.
It's not about what you know, or what you think, it's about what you can prove. Clearly, today showed the government couldn't prove a damn thing.
I think George Anthony was the most disappointed after hearing the verdict.
- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- 4,079
- 179
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by rashi
All of you want to convict her. Based on what? The government had all the advantages to wrap this up, unlimited resources, and yet couldn't prove anything. There's isn't a murder weapon, their motive was weak. The Judge was clearly prosecution leaning, every single media outlet was hammering and hammering on the defense (in which I was critical on his approach) for the past month and still couldn't convict her based on the evidence presented.
It's not about what you know, or what you think, it's about what you can prove. Clearly, today showed the government couldn't prove a damn thing.
I think George Anthony was the most disappointed after hearing the verdict.
- 13,923
- 5,893
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2004
I had a feeling it was going to end in this fashion. Awhile back they had these people on the stand stating certain things that they are doing are new or haven't been done before. etc... The defense attorneys really went in and discredited a lot of people. They should have trained the people who would be up on the stand to be a little better at what they would say or how they would say it. Sketchy is a good word to call what I saw on TV for those couple of minutes.
I just wonder how she could afford such a great lawyer. Was he new? Did he do it pro bono to get his name out? It's just a crazy situation when you have lawyers calling you and trying to represent you, like you won a prize or something
I just wonder how she could afford such a great lawyer. Was he new? Did he do it pro bono to get his name out? It's just a crazy situation when you have lawyers calling you and trying to represent you, like you won a prize or something
- 1,247
- 23
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2008
You really think a prosecutor in a case with this much media coverage and this sort of fact pattern could have headlined the case with anything but first degree murder? Might have led to more time for the defendant but that was never an option for the prosecutor.
Simply put....THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TO CONVICT FOR MURDER ONE.
The case was weak as hell. They couldn't even find one witness to say she ever abused the child, let alone kill her. They should NOT have tried for capital murder.
- 24,030
- 1,927
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
agreed,
and I think she did it, I just don't think justice should be perverted on a case by case basis.
