- 74,568
- 62,219
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by 5tan
Okay, then, its unisex, how about we are both right, lol.
Originally Posted by DiPlOmAt TDOt
Also I was told there's a BROWN Inventuer Reversible now.
Originally Posted by curt2121
Pretty sure there are two widths in that belt, one more for women (i'm pretty sure it was a 30), one more for men (40). Then the "natural" color is always in the women's section as well although it comes in both widths
Originally Posted by RFX45
Originally Posted by curt2121
Pretty sure there are two widths in that belt, one more for women (i'm pretty sure it was a 30), one more for men (40). Then the "natural" color is always in the women's section as well although it comes in both widths
I checked earlier in the LV website and they didn't have it. Well, they do have it but when you click on it, it brings you to the Men's belt.
No hate though, some of the women's belt does look good. I kind of like this one, I guess due to the print and how it is printed.
Finally, someone who can put into words what I've been feeling for a while. Good post!Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I've skimmed through about 40 pages of this thread and the one thing that comes to mind is this: logo abuse. Gucci, LV and Burberry are the main culprits.
The logo-heavy lines from those designers are not high fashion. They are constructed by these designer labels for two reasons: free advertising for the designer, and for the wearer to broadcast how much money they spend on clothes. Everyone knows how much a Burberry wallet, a Burberry polo, and a Gucci belt cost. And it's cheaply made. Burberry, for example, is the worst. Their wallets feel like plastic. They're terrible.
People obsessed with status symbols buy this stuff, but true high fashion (and fashion sense) lies in pieces that make sense with a wardrobe. If you're rockin' Sean John jeans with a Gucci belt, then you look like a fool. I have plenty of designer stuff, from Armani Collection to Michael Bastian, and even Burberry, but you'd never know who made what unless I told you. No logos.
I think it would behoove a lot of you to move past the logos and appreciate what some designers have out there based on how it all looks together, or at least how you can make it look with your wardrobe, rather than choose one item at a time that doesn't make sense.
And don't misinterpret this post, there's nothing wrong with the labels I mentioned early in this thread. They are pioneering fashion houses that have defined fashion for years (or 150, in the case of one of them), but they can be pulled off with better sensibility. LV is a relative newcomer to clothing, but the brand is ubiquitous. They have taken advantage of a marketing opportunity that costs them next to nothing.
Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I've skimmed through about 40 pages of this thread and the one thing that comes to mind is this: logo abuse. Gucci, LV and Burberry are the main culprits.
The logo-heavy lines from those designers are not high fashion. They are constructed by these designer labels for two reasons: free advertising for the designer, and for the wearer to broadcast how much money they spend on clothes. Everyone knows how much a Burberry wallet, a Burberry polo, and a Gucci belt cost. And it's cheaply made. Burberry, for example, is the worst. Their wallets feel like plastic. They're terrible.
People obsessed with status symbols buy this stuff, but true high fashion (and fashion sense) lies in pieces that make sense with a wardrobe. If you're rockin' Sean John jeans with a Gucci belt, then you look like a fool. I have plenty of designer stuff, from Armani Collection to Michael Bastian, and even Burberry, but you'd never know who made what unless I told you. No logos.
I think it would behoove a lot of you to move past the logos and appreciate what some designers have out there based on how it all looks together, or at least how you can make it look with your wardrobe, rather than choose one item at a time that doesn't make sense.
And don't misinterpret this post, there's nothing wrong with the labels I mentioned early in this thread. They are pioneering fashion houses that have defined fashion for years (or 150, in the case of one of them), but they can be pulled off with better sensibility. LV is a relative newcomer to clothing, but the brand is ubiquitous. They have taken advantage of a marketing opportunity that costs them next to nothing.
Yo Russ ask for Franklin. Hes my SA, hes good. He knows what he is talking about and will search hard for anything or let you know if somethingcomes up.Originally Posted by Russ tha G
Ok, I called the local LV. They said the small size is already sold out across the country... so I have a medium on hold until I get out of class. Depending on the SA, sometimes they're clueless, though. So, if this one doesn't fit I'll ask one of the ones I usually deal with if they can get it... or I'll make my GF just deal with it.