- 5,215
- 118
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
Who else is loving this 75 degree weather right now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Boys Noize
Who else is loving this 75 degree weather right now?
Originally Posted by Boys Noize
Who else is loving this 75 degree weather right now?
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
You happy with CA>NY>NJ?
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
You happy with CA>NY>NJ?
We a movement doggie.Originally Posted by doin90onthefreeway
at LeGod
We a movement doggie.Originally Posted by doin90onthefreeway
at LeGod
Originally Posted by JD617
I wouldn't mind if Los Angeles drifted off into the Pacific somewhere.
Originally Posted by JD617
I wouldn't mind if Los Angeles drifted off into the Pacific somewhere.
Originally Posted by durty pancakes
A group of more than 100 scientists and experts say in a new report that California faces the risk of a massive "superstorm" that could flood a quarter of the state's homes and cause $300 billion to $400 billion in damage. Researchers point out that the potential scale of destruction in this storm scenario is four or five times the amount of damage that could be wrought by a major earthquake.
It sounds like the plot of an apocalyptic action movie, but scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey warned federal and state emergency officials that California's geological history shows such "superstorms" have happened in the past, and should be added to the long list of natural disasters to worry about in the Golden State.
The threat of a cataclysmic California storm has been dormant for the past 150 years. Geological Survey director Marcia K. McNutt http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/yb...r-superstorm/39696742/SIG=1232dqk7h/*<a href=/www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/science/earth/16flood.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/20.../earth/16flood.html?_r=1">told the New York Times that a 300-mile stretch of the Central Valley was inundated from 1861-62. The floods were so bad that the state capital had to be moved to San Francisco, and Governor Leland Stanford had to take a rowboat to his own inauguration, the report notes. Even larger storms happened in past centuries, over the dates 212, 440, 603, 1029, 1418, and 1605, according to geological evidence.
The risk is gathering momentum now, scientists say, due to rising temperatures in the atmosphere, which has generally made weather patterns more volatile.
The scientists built a model that showed a storm could last for more than 40 days and dump 10 feet of water on the state. The storm would be goaded on by an "atmospheric river" that would move water "at the same rate as 50 Mississippis discharging water into the Gulf of Mexico," http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/yb...r-superstorm/39696742/SIG=1231f8i5p/*<a href=/www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_17099974?nclick_check=1">http://www.mercurynews.co..._17099974?nclick_check=1">according to the AP. Winds could reach 125 miles per hour, and landslides could compound the damage, the report notes.
Such a superstorm is hypothetical
Originally Posted by durty pancakes
A group of more than 100 scientists and experts say in a new report that California faces the risk of a massive "superstorm" that could flood a quarter of the state's homes and cause $300 billion to $400 billion in damage. Researchers point out that the potential scale of destruction in this storm scenario is four or five times the amount of damage that could be wrought by a major earthquake.
It sounds like the plot of an apocalyptic action movie, but scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey warned federal and state emergency officials that California's geological history shows such "superstorms" have happened in the past, and should be added to the long list of natural disasters to worry about in the Golden State.
The threat of a cataclysmic California storm has been dormant for the past 150 years. Geological Survey director Marcia K. McNutt http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/yb...r-superstorm/39696742/SIG=1232dqk7h/*<a href=/www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/science/earth/16flood.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/20.../earth/16flood.html?_r=1">told the New York Times that a 300-mile stretch of the Central Valley was inundated from 1861-62. The floods were so bad that the state capital had to be moved to San Francisco, and Governor Leland Stanford had to take a rowboat to his own inauguration, the report notes. Even larger storms happened in past centuries, over the dates 212, 440, 603, 1029, 1418, and 1605, according to geological evidence.
The risk is gathering momentum now, scientists say, due to rising temperatures in the atmosphere, which has generally made weather patterns more volatile.
The scientists built a model that showed a storm could last for more than 40 days and dump 10 feet of water on the state. The storm would be goaded on by an "atmospheric river" that would move water "at the same rate as 50 Mississippis discharging water into the Gulf of Mexico," http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/yb...r-superstorm/39696742/SIG=1231f8i5p/*<a href=/www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_17099974?nclick_check=1">http://www.mercurynews.co..._17099974?nclick_check=1">according to the AP. Winds could reach 125 miles per hour, and landslides could compound the damage, the report notes.
Such a superstorm is hypothetical
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
You happy with CA>NY>NJ?
I would prefer NY>CA>Ohio>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NJ but i'll live
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
Originally Posted by whyhellothere
Originally Posted by MALCALA622
NJ>NY
you can't be serious
You happy with CA>NY>NJ?
I would prefer NY>CA>Ohio>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NJ but i'll live