- 1,154
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
This is the irony.
So many people want it to pass, but the reality is that no matter what happens those who want to blaze will blaze.
***The Official Legalization of Cannabis Thread***
This is the irony.
So many people want it to pass, but the reality is that no matter what happens those who want to blaze will blaze.
- 1,154
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
This is the irony.
So many people want it to pass, but the reality is that no matter what happens those who want to blaze will blaze.
- 2,608
- 89
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
57% no
43% yes
with 2% in
43% yes
with 2% in
- 2,608
- 89
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
57% no
43% yes
with 2% in
43% yes
with 2% in
- 274
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- 274
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- 10,215
- 3,310
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
why would drug dealers vote yes? They would be losing money. (then again, most drug dealers either cant vote or dont care either way)
- 10,215
- 3,310
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
why would drug dealers vote yes? They would be losing money. (then again, most drug dealers either cant vote or dont care either way)
- 4,405
- 484
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
[h1]Prop. 19 headed to defeat, exit polls show[/h1]
November 2, 2010 | 8:32pm
California voters appear to have rejected Prop. 19, an effort to legalize marijuana and allow local governments to tax the sale of the drug.
Prop. 19 received national attention, but relatively little money was spent on the campaign. While millions of dollars was spent on other ballot measures, the Prop. 19 campaign was modest by California political standards. Still, no issue received more attention around the state.
The measure was opposed by law enforcement groups and elected officials from both political parties.
U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder had said the Obama administration would "vigorously enforce" federal drug laws against Californians who grow or sell marijuana for recreational use even if voters passed the legalization measure.
The Times is projecting Proposition 19's defeat based on preliminary information from the National Voter Pool survey, conducted for The Times by Edison Research. The National Voter Pool is a consortium of the major television news networks and the Associated Press. The survey was conducted at 50 polling places among roughly 2,200 election day voters and was supplemented by a telephone survey of roughly 600 voters who cast ballots by mail.
- 4,405
- 484
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
[h1]Prop. 19 headed to defeat, exit polls show[/h1]
November 2, 2010 | 8:32pm
California voters appear to have rejected Prop. 19, an effort to legalize marijuana and allow local governments to tax the sale of the drug.
Prop. 19 received national attention, but relatively little money was spent on the campaign. While millions of dollars was spent on other ballot measures, the Prop. 19 campaign was modest by California political standards. Still, no issue received more attention around the state.
The measure was opposed by law enforcement groups and elected officials from both political parties.
U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder had said the Obama administration would "vigorously enforce" federal drug laws against Californians who grow or sell marijuana for recreational use even if voters passed the legalization measure.
The Times is projecting Proposition 19's defeat based on preliminary information from the National Voter Pool survey, conducted for The Times by Edison Research. The National Voter Pool is a consortium of the major television news networks and the Associated Press. The survey was conducted at 50 polling places among roughly 2,200 election day voters and was supplemented by a telephone survey of roughly 600 voters who cast ballots by mail.
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
It's still early.Originally Posted by gambit215
Really!??!?!?!?!?!? So much for progress..................
CA has some areas that are hugely conservative, we don't know where the precincts reporting are located.
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
It's still early.Originally Posted by gambit215
Really!??!?!?!?!?!? So much for progress..................
CA has some areas that are hugely conservative, we don't know where the precincts reporting are located.
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
It aint over till the fat lady sings!
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
It aint over till the fat lady sings!
- 2,280
- 643
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
no matter the outcome, i'm gonna be
tonight
tonight
- 957
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
^this.
- 2,280
- 643
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
no matter the outcome, i'm gonna be
tonight
tonight
- 957
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
^this.
- 8,406
- 41
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
LA, SF, Alameda not counted yetOriginally Posted by CincoSeisDos
It's still early.Originally Posted by gambit215
Really!??!?!?!?!?!? So much for progress..................
CA has some areas that are hugely conservative, we don't know where the precincts reporting are located.
- 8,406
- 41
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
LA, SF, Alameda not counted yetOriginally Posted by CincoSeisDos
It's still early.Originally Posted by gambit215
Really!??!?!?!?!?!? So much for progress..................
CA has some areas that are hugely conservative, we don't know where the precincts reporting are located.
- 17,626
- 456
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
Quoting yourself is so 2007.
This may go down, but the defeat won't be as big as the current numbers show.
