- 13,066
- 7,262
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
DLPhotos....what lens are you shooting with? Nice shots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thanks!Great Pics DLFotos! We had a nice amount of snow here in indianapolis finally. I love snow!
Thanks Fongstarr. Most of them where with an 11-16 2.8. The fisheyes with rokinon 8mmDLPhotos....what lens are you shooting with? Nice shots.
Thanks!LA08Native-- Great post processing. It's hard getting kids at that age to smile. haha
Just got back from enlarging 2 of my pictures at Walgreens.
I got them enlarged to 8X10 thinking they would scale the image down but no, they simply cropped it!
Horrible quality.
Complete loss of details in the shadows.
Horrible. HORRIBLE. HORRIBLE!
Canon people, I'm about to make the jump to FF and I'm deciding between the 5d MKII or the 6D. Anything I need to take into consideration when looking at these two cameras? Thanks in advance.
I'll probably go to an actual camera store near me to make enlargements... I will pay more, but I'm sure the quality will be there.One thing I truly hate about Walgreens prints. There is only so many sizes that scale down right. I've printed at Kinko at their kiosk printer and it scaled the picture down but the cost is way more then Walgreens.
I was in the same dilemma and chose the Mark 2. The one thing I truly hate about the Mark 2 is the autofocus. Maybe I didn't research it well but I never knew the damn thing is that slow and misses its mark all the time. I am not sure if the 6D has the same autofocus as the 7D but I know the Mark 3 has the same autofocus as the 7D. But still, the price and ISO power, I would still go with the Mark 2 or just save some more and get the Mark 3.
And just some random photos with the 24mm L. Mind you I am still having some issue shooting with it, so these photos are kind of boring.
I'll probably go to an actual camera store near me to make enlargements... I will pay more, but I'm sure the quality will be there.
That's a nice sized print though... pretty sure paying 70 bucks was well justified.I've even heard if you do it at legit camera stores that they will keep reprinting the photo till it gets to your liking. They could even do all the photoshop edits as well. A guy I know did a photo show and he went to a local place here in SF and each print was about $70 on matte paper (16X18 i think) but it looked really damn good and he ended up selling most photos for $300 a piece.
Nice pics Fong. Thanks for the advice as well. I'll have to research a little more. I'd like to get the Mark III, but that may be a little too steep price wise.
Just got back from enlarging 2 of my pictures at Walgreens.
I got them enlarged to 8X10 thinking they would scale the image down but no, they simply cropped it!
Horrible quality.
Complete loss of details in the shadows.
Horrible. HORRIBLE. HORRIBLE!
Right on man.I'd say the majority of that quality loss is the fact that you tried to print it at Walgreens... I took some pics to Walmart to get 4x6 and verified that you get what you pay for. If you're going to be shooting with the intention of printing you should look into a print lab... The prices aren't bad at all...