**Washington Wizards Offseason Thread** Blatche re-upped....5 years/35 mil

[jaflash]

that ishh is ugly

 

[doublejs07]

Wilbon's thoughts on moving Arenas....

What to do with Gilbert Arenas, which is the issue that worries a lotof folks, is a secondary issue. From conversations I had with severalclub executives Tuesday, it's apparent that the Wizards most likelywould have to take back somebody else's hideous contract or bad actorsin a swap for Arenas. What could really be advantageous for the Wizardsis to simply wait to trade Arenas. If he plays relatively well duringthe first half of the season, he becomes a more attractive player totrade for in February, before the trade deadline.

This wouldn't fly in some markets; I'm thinking about Phoenix. ButWashington isn't a place where the conservatives are going to runArenas out of town. He'll get booed, but that's about it. Team ownerTed Leonsis and President Ernie Grunfeld know this market, which meansthey have to know they shouldn't be in a hurry. Knowing this marketalso means knowing there's no overbearing impatience here. For betteror worse, we're not New York or Boston or Philly, where the need to puta winner on the floor sometimes turns desperate, which leads toterrible deals being made. The Wizards, we all know, are rebuilding andit's going to take a while, so whether you deal Arenas in July orJanuary makes very little difference.


Link

It's gonna happen one way or another....Arenas won't last the whole season in DC.  He'll pad his #'s (if he's around before the trade deadline), and someone will bite....a team looking to make a splash and make a roster addition who can help with a playoff push. 

 

[TheGift23]

May be good on the court...would never wear those casually though.

 

[pr0phecy718]

i'm sorry but those are hideous looking

 

[im not you]

Copped

 

[ThaxbyChamblis]

Originally Posted by Im Not You

Not #based

 

[Sonny Corinthos]

 Reebok must not want people to buy it for some reason

 

[hood17]

Originally Posted by VABigPoppa

I'll wait for those to go on sale.

 

[bangdak]

They look really, really light though.


I'll cop if it was likw 20$

 

[ratboy90]

Originally Posted by DoubleJs07

Originally Posted by VABigPoppa

Hmmmm......

look light as hell tho...

IMO hideous.

 

[durden7]

How does something look light? 

 

[seymore cake]

Originally Posted by dreClark

Originally Posted by Im Not You

Not #based

Not At All.

 

[doublejs07]

Originally Posted by Durden7

How does something look light? 

Same way something can look heavy.  There's your answer. 

 

[mr jordan04]

You know john wall saw those and was like damn, why didn't I sign with nike!?

 

[vabigpoppa]

NikeKid6 posted this in the Other Brands forum, this colorway isnt too bad, maybe they will grow on me...

 

[scott frost]

That color scheme is legit.

 

[buc em]

 Copped, I don't discriminate against other shoe brands. Tried on the Zigtech running shoes yesterday and liked how they felt. I hope to god that they really did scrap the "Reebok" on the heel/lateral side of the shoe and it isn't just that colorway though..

 

[durden7]

Originally Posted by DoubleJs07

Originally Posted by Durden7

How does something look light? 

Same way something can look heavy.  There's your answer. 

Ok so how does something look heavy....

 

[tommykairaa]

 

[melovp]

^I can believe in that cw..other joints are hot trash

 

[dt43]

maybe it's just a psychological thing because we're all so used to wearing Nike.. but that Reebok logo is just unsightly on any shoe.

 

[doublejs07]

Wall's Reebok Commercial...



:18....look who pass him the ball

Torch has been passed....


*I'm feeling the white colorway....I like it A LOT.

 

[rook]

Those sneakers are ugly.

 

[bijald0331]

The 2nd color scheme posted is at least okay on the eyes. I have to try out this zigtech stuff.

 

[scotthallwithapick]

Looking like Variant Chris Benoit JV wrestling shoes