- 69,474
- 105,894
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
Honestly though Disney is making an exorbitant amount off these properties, it's despicable to ask for more for no reason unless there's more to it. But business is business.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What I don’t get and can someone explain this to me
Being one of the biggest companies on the planet, and in history, wouldn’t Disney have thought this through?
Iike make sure whatever happens in the future one of their biggest new money makers is safe at Disney?
Man, he's still a kid.But FFH practically set him up as the heir apparent lol
Suit building theme song and all
Thats the thing though Spidey was never @ Disney film wise and isn't a moneymaker when it comes to movies.What I don’t get and can someone explain this to me
Being one of the biggest companies on the planet, and in history, wouldn’t Disney have thought this through?
Iike make sure whatever happens in the future one of their biggest new money makers is safe at Disney?
Something cool would be avengers teaming with luchadores and fight the same enemy
But YALL don't wanna LISTEN man
Disney a whole *** for asking for this, but I dunno if it's the right decision. Under Marvel's watch they'll probably do better and continue to make more money even with that ****** deal than solo with another reboot.As much as fans are complaining, this is the right decision for Sony. Disney is trying to strong arm them into taking a terrible deal. Disney already gets 100% of the merchandising for Spiderman as well as 5% of the Sony Spiderman movies (even though they don't contribute a dime). Now Disney wants to become 50/50 financial and creative partners with Sony on Spiderman AND 50% of ALL SPIDERMAN PROPERTIES (Sinister Six, Venom, etc.). Disney is really tryna Deebo Sony here and I can see why Sony walked away from the table. That being said, I still expect them to get a deal done.
As much as fans are complaining, this is the right decision for Sony. Disney is trying to strong arm them into taking a terrible deal. Disney already gets 100% of the merchandising for Spiderman as well as 5% of the Sony Spiderman movies (even though they don't contribute a dime). Now Disney wants to become 50/50 financial and creative partners with Sony on Spiderman AND 50% of ALL SPIDERMAN PROPERTIES (Sinister Six, Venom, etc.). Disney is really tryna Deebo Sony here and I can see why Sony walked away from the table. That being said, I still expect them to get a deal done.
Marvel never wanted to work with the ****** *** FoX-Men though. So it would not even matter what energy they were keeping.Fox would've kept that same energy had Mordoch not sold 20th century.
Nah, I'm sorry but Sony is overplaying their hand. The merchandising rights should not be a part of this discussion:
https://screenrant.com/spider-man-disney-marvel-sony-toys-details/
That was a separate deal done back in 2011, 4 years before the current Sony/Disney deal took place that allowed marvel studios to use Spider-man in 3 team-up films and they would then be the creative minds behind 2 solo films published under Sony. Sony gets all the profit from those films minus 5% of the opening weekend take. Some were saying that's why Far From Home opened on a Tuesday, to try to help downplay those weekend numbers and thereby hurting how much they have to give to DIsney.
That deal is now over. The last reboot Sony did was a proven failure both commercially and critically. Far From Home is their most successful movie ever, undoubtedly helped by being the first marvel movie post Endgame. Disney is just trying to negotiate better terms for themselves on a new deal. 50/50 split on the profits and the production costs. Hollywood Reporter is saying that Disney actually asked for just 30%.
I say **** 'em. End of the day, no one budges and the only people that lose are the fans.
I'd rather have 100% of $700m instead of 70% of 1B
Hmm...
It's the same amount of money but they'd have to give up alot of creative control to get there, it's not worth it for Sony and I get why they would walk away, especially if an average movie like Venom can make $850m without Disney's influence
spidey is the most licensed hero in the world and earns a billion plus a year and that was back in 2014: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/superhero-earns-13-billion-a-748281
plus part of the deal was that they could use Spidey in other MCU film (he has been in more Disney films than Sony films) so its not like marvel only reaped the benefits of just the 5% and billion $ on merch annually, spidey merch making disney way more money than sony is on their films since only one spidey film has made a billi and its probably safe to assume merch is always making the mouse a billi every year
its hard to quantify how much spidey brought in for cw, iw and eg but he was a big part of those and those movies wouldnt be the same without him so i think thats a bigger benefit than the 5%
also keep in mind, disney keeps the 100% merch $$$ even if they dont make a deal with sony so thats still a billi a year in their pockets no matter what and i dont think thats just on the spiderman character but the whole spider universe so venom, spiderverse, morbius, carnage, etc... merch are all disneys and according to this, sony has 900 spidey characters they can develop: https://www.inquisitr.com/5340323/m...er-marvel-characters-to-be-developed-by-sony/
Reading up on this Tom rothman dude, who was formerly at fox (and infamously rejected deadpool and was behind what happened to the character at the end of origins) and his role at Sony where he took over for ole girl Amy..
“Tom is thinking ‘Okay, we’ve learned everything we need to from Kevin’s playbook. We did Venom on our own and we did Spider-Verse,'” comments a Sony insider.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/h...t-doesnt-need-kevins-playbook-anymore-1233644