- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
according to dirty, guys like you don't exist.
oh please.
where did I say that?...
...do quote me.
I said nothing of the sort.....don't try to pull that nonsense logic in an attempt to validate your opinion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
according to dirty, guys like you don't exist.
oh please.
where did I say that?...
...do quote me.
I said nothing of the sort.....don't try to pull that nonsense logic in an attempt to validate your opinion.
what nonsense logic?Originally Posted by eNPHAN
oh please.
where did I say that?...
...do quote me.
I said nothing of the sort.....don't try to pull that nonsense logic in an attempt to validate your opinion.
it's funny that you interpret having sex in a spot that's not the norm as the girl not having respect for herself.
but you're mixing up things now.
you're talking about your random skanks, whom the guy does not care about...
....but one could be in a committed and caring relationship and still have sex in unusual places
Like I said... you're thinking of two different concepts
random skanks(which could possibly be a GF to some guys) vs someone you truly care about...
edit..and you could have sex in random places with BOTH types of girls.
in NONE of my replies did I indicate that there were NOT any guys that were jerks that would try to manipulate women.
Yes, they exist.. but that does not negate my original point... that women who have sex in non normal places have any less respect for themselves.
....so..yes... that is nonsense logic for you to state I claim that guys like that poster dont' exist.
Dude.. how come I was thinkin the same thing..Originally Posted by Kingtre
at the risk of not seeing where this thread went im gonna avoid the headache thats sure to come if i went back and read the whole thing=
but is the argument that my gf/fiance/wife shouldnt have sex with me in random places for fear that she will have to disclose these actions if and when he time comes in a future relationship?
hmm- so my stance would be yes its more IF its a girl that you respect and are planning to be with -Originally Posted by eNPHAN
Originally Posted by Kingtre
no, at this point the argument is the value of sex
is it more, or is it just a nut?
i argue that it's more...
and it's funny how i'm like....1 of 3 that agree....vs....like 20....
Originally Posted by Kingtre
hmm- so my stance would be yes its more IF its a girl that you respect and are planning to be with -Originally Posted by eNPHAN
Originally Posted by Kingtre
no, at this point the argument is the value of sex
is it more, or is it just a nut?
i argue that it's more...
and it's funny how i'm like....1 of 3 that agree....vs....like 20....
but does that mean that certain adventurous type freak activities shouldn't commence because she is your GF...maybe this whole argument missed me-
Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773
The funny thing is, when youre with your girl and you do crazy stuff with her, it's not a big deal. Cause it's you. But as soon as she tells you she did the same things in the past with someone else, then it's a problem, she's a hoSome guys think like that, that's why you dont need to know.
QFTOriginally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773
That's why you do not ask about details of her past, all you ask is if she's clean.