Man, I totally get where you're coming from. You made some points that counter mine, but I think neither one of us are wrong... Just different perspective becuase we're vierwing the world from two different lenses.
In response to your first point, I get that certain white people (usually the wealthy ones) have a certain "privilege" that black people don't as far as the penalties they face when committing a crime. Should punishment for crime be equal? Of course, but at the end of the day, if you don't commit a crime, racial disparity in the penalties becomes irrelevant. Should black parents warn their kids that they should be extra careful when committing a crime because unlike a white guy, they might end up dead? How about teaching kids to obey the law and not commit crimes in the first place? Every single story that's posted about some black guy who gets killed during the commission of a crime, Mr. Marcus is always quick to point out that had it been a white guy, he would've lived, as if there's some huge white conspiracy going on.
You brought up wealth, but I'm talking about the overall numbers that show that black people are punished 4x as much. Not all of those people are rich. There's been several psychological studies that show that many people look at black people as criminals... or just negatively.
The media does it all the time. Hell, look at the movie Exodus. From there, I think that it's embedded in a lot of people's psyche that black = bad, and they're hardly given the "kids will be kids" tag...
Let's be real... kids do stupid things. What you're asking for isn't wrong and it isnt too much to ask... But it's pretty unrealistic to think that if you will eradicate all people breaking the law.
You were taught not to do a lot of stuff as a kid, but you still did it... Does that mean you shouldnt be afforded a second chance? Heck no.
And you talk about Mr Marcus pointing that out because there have been SEVERAL instances where ARMED white men who actually SHOT AT COPS were taken in alive... While time after time unarmed black men are met with excessive force.
Mr Marcus is simply stating that there should be some levelness to the game.. Atleast kill the white guys like you kill the black guys... or use patience with black men like you use with white men...
Whatever you want to say, I think he's just aiming for some even level of interaction with the police... and we can all point to several cases where that's just not true.
Going onto your second point, the public's perception is based on the frequency of occurrence, not body county. Statistically, mass shootings are usually perpetrated by white guys. However, despite the body count, the mass shootings are usually isolated and random incidents which aren't reflective of the communities they occur in (i.e. Sandy Hook, Aurora, etc.) That's why when an otherwise unforeseeable mass shooting occurs, people look for answers as to why it happened. In the case of Adam Lanza and James Holmes, both had documented mental illness PRIOR to their respective crimes. Now compare that to the almost daily shootings that occur in predominantly lower income minority neighborhoods. The public perceives those incidents as being reflective of the communities they occur in, which is why you don't see the same outrage as you do with mass shootings.
but that's the thing... they dont.. they view that as a BLACK problem, and not an ECONOMIC problem... I've posted several stats in here as to why the black murder rates are much higher than other counter parts and one thing remains the same...
middle class and upper class black people do not commit crimes no where near the same rate as lower class black people...
but our entire community is denigrated because of it. How many mass shootings have middle and upper class black people been apart of?
The thing is... When it comes to those mass shootings, there is a collective that looks to identify WHY it happens... But with black murders in lower income areas, we KNOW why it happens... But the media portrays at is something totally differnent than what it is...
an ECONOMIC problem.. not a BLACK problem...
When you see a mass shooting occur involving a white guy such as Adam Lanza or James Holmes, you don't see anyone, including other white people defending their actions. When a black guy commits a crime though, there's never any accountability. Instead, you get responses like why didn't the cop shoot the gun out of Antonio Martin's hand, or why do white people who commit crime get to live but black guys get killed? It's unfortunate that Michael Brown was killed, and I think that Darren Wilson should have at least been indicted to allow a jury to decide whether a crime had been committed. However, despite attempts to make Michael Brown out to be some saint, think about this. Had Michael Brown NOT been shot and killed that day, he would have likely been charged with strong armed robbery and possibly assault of a police officer. That's in no way excusing or justifying what Darren Wilson did, but it goes to show that not every incident is a matter of fault by one party or the other.
People dont defend their actions because they're too busy looking for the cause of it and not labeling them as quickly as they do black people.
And even Mr Marcus said in the other thread with antonio holmes.. .if he had a gun, he should be shot... No logical person on this board has ever backed a black man that was armed and aiming at the cops.
No one. Not one. Never. Not even a little bit... so that talk of shooting the gun out of Martin's hand is hyperbole.
you followed that sentence up with why do white people not get killed... Yes, black people do ask that question because we see it time and time again of white armed men getting taken into custody.
The thing that Marcus is saying that yes, they're both criminals... and yes, they're both doing wrong. We all agree on that...
You stop there and say "well dont do the crime"
But other go deeper, as when adam Lanza or James holmes goes on a rampage... and asks, "hey... why couldnt this situation w/ the white guy be handled like the situation with the black guy, or vice versa?"
It seems like it's okay to dig deeper when deranged lunatics go on a shooting rampage... but not okay when two situations involving the same circumstances are handled completely differently, when one results in death....
With Mike Brown, yes, you're right about the charges... But when has those charges EVER been punishable by death from a cop that wasnt even aware of the store situation in the first place?