- 37
- 32
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
Legit check for concord 11s. replacement laces pleaseView media item 1008279View media item 1008280View media item 1008281View media item 1008281View media item 1008283View media item 1008284
1996 OG Concord 11 LC
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by akjordanhead,
- Start date
- 14,511
- 19,653
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
Looks good to me!
- 2,924
- 914
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
real, but the sole might have been whiten at one point. those don't look as yellow as it should be.
- 14,511
- 19,653
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
Keep in mind the the 1996 OG Concords had blue soles. That could cause the difference in yellowing.
- 37
- 32
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2014
I would love more feedback please other NT subscribers!
- 19,057
- 9,030
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2013
How many people do you want? Lol
think they look good, just hope youre buying for your collection and not wearing
- 669
- 120
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2014
Legit
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
They look ok.. Wouldn't try to rock them personally though..
- 2,924
- 914
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
Yea, but from the pic it looks like it has blue tint left on the shoe which might be someone tried to dye them with blue dye.
- 14,511
- 19,653
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
http://m.*************.com/Sneakers...ison-2011-vs-OG-vs-OG-Toddler-vs-2000-vs-DMP/
Since the Ogs on there are DS I'd say the yellowing/faded blue tint combination look consistent with a worn pair.
Since the Ogs on there are DS I'd say the yellowing/faded blue tint combination look consistent with a worn pair.
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
NT doesnt condone ur link lol
Last edited:
- 14,511
- 19,653
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
Lol should have seen that one coming. I'll post the pics in a bit.
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
They be blanking out all kind of sites but they don't blank out old faithful Flightclub.com lol
- 2,924
- 914
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2014
Went and just looked it up from sole collector which you linked. Non of the shoes from 96, 00, dmp, to the 2011 has yellowing and it's written in 2011. No idea how they did it or how it's kept, but those are the super DS without any yellowing. I don't think it can be compared with a used pair. Most of the people that has OG 96 even really well kept DS are no where looking like those in SC's article.
Last edited:
