- 12,723
- 6,201
It is what it is. I guess
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
False, this is true about the Lakers players.Every player is trying to win a given game..
What I was saying is we played horrible enough to give all 4 of those games away, and still no matter we won.
It took them a month left in the season to do so. Be gone.Is that not exactly what just happened? I don't even know what yall are talking about anymore. Yall ****** trippin. I'm out
False, this is true about the Lakers players.Every player is trying to win a given game..
What I was saying is we played horrible enough to give all 4 of those games away, and still no matter we won.
They'll do what you allow them to do man. If course we don't have influence over what happens but the people who do, mainly management and the coach do have the say in what happens directly.
To ensure we don't drop or if the top four we need to be in the top 3. There's a myriad of ways to do this that I won't rehash, but it's a combination of having the coach and management working in concert with each other. I don't even blame the players too much they are going to play keeping their own interests in mind. But the coach and management can limit or eliminate those options thereby successfully preserving the all important pick.
Yes Ellington, Lin, Boozer etc aren't all world players but they're still pros with experience that have proven to be capable players much more so than the young guys. They're not in the plans for us next year, they're only goal is to get their stock up and audition for other squads so why do you have them in the game when you're down double digits? Why not give Clarkson, Black, he'll even Sacre and Kelly those minutes to actually see what you have as you try and evaluate the pieces that actually hopefully will be here going forward. Them being younger and inexperienced likely would not lead to those same resIf the kids end up stealing a game finesabotaging our efforts. If the kids end up stealing a game fine there's at least something to draw from that going forward. But all these vets just eying the next payday, that's when it becomes asinine and useless.
They'll do what you allow them to do man. If course we don't have influence over what happens but the people who do, mainly management and the coach do have the say in what happens directly.
To ensure we don't drop or if the top four we need to be in the top 3. There's a myriad of ways to do this that I won't rehash, but it's a combination of having the coach and management working in concert with each other. I don't even blame the players too much they are going to play keeping their own interests in mind. But the coach and management can limit or eliminate those options thereby successfully preserving the all important pick.
Yes Ellington, Lin, Boozer etc aren't all world players but they're still pros with experience that have proven to be capable players much more so than the young guys. They're not in the plans for us next year, they're only goal is to get their stock up and audition for other squads so why do you have them in the game when you're down double digits? Why not give Clarkson, Black, he'll even Sacre and Kelly those minutes to actually see what you have as you try and evaluate the pieces that actually hopefully will be here going forward. Them being younger and inexperienced likely would not lead to those same resIf the kids end up stealing a game finesabotaging our efforts. If the kids end up stealing a game fine there's at least something to draw from that going forward. But all these vets just eying the next payday, that's when it becomes asinine and useless.
Still *****ing and moaning. Yall ****** trippin. I'm out
Way to bold some **** out of context. Still playing Ellington and Wes right? People that won't be here next year right? At that point they hadn't sat down ANYONE.Still *****ing and moaning. Yall ****** trippin. I'm out
Way to bold some **** out of context. Still playing Ellington and Wes right? People that won't be here next year right? At that point they hadn't sat down ANYONE.
Way to bold some **** out of context. Still playing Ellington and Wes right? People that won't be here next year right? At that point they hadn't sat down ANYONE.
Got damn how many guys you expect them to bench. You really want them to ride out with six players.
real talk, this is a better defensive shuffle than jeremy lin'sChecking in and saw that this thread jumped which can't be a good sign and sure enough, the Lakers won at the buzzer?!?
Bittersweet.
But realistically,
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2015/3/...-won-at-the-buzzer-and-their-fans-are-furious
So orl and lal split season series....let's say orl and us finish at 22-60...what's the next tie breaker?
Or do they combine permutations and split down the middle?? And who gets the nod on the totem pole if neither wins a top 3???
But the permutations are for top 3..does that also determine standings should neither get a top 3?