- 22,094
- 9,980
this is so stupid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Utah? New Jersey? Lakers?
I said back to back. Meaning one year after the previous. I don't think the NBA has ever seen the best or better team in the NBA Finals lose two years in a row.
Except, I said Draymond is great at what he does. Again, doesn't necessarily have to be a sig. But something along the lines of what those dudes I listed got.You dont just get a sig because you're good at what you do. Alot of players are good at what they do.
Also im pretty sure Nike only gives out a very limited amount of Sigs so they dont saturate their own market.
And im sure Giannis is #1 on the list for that very limited spot with an international player finally being as marketable as he will be. Nike probably been waiting for someone like Giannis forever.
they werent better teams then the team they lost to..What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.
Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
I should have said in a 7 game series. 16 - 0 doesn't seem likely to me...I think GS can be beaten, it just doesn't look like it
ya sure why not,,,Kahwi must be in the lineup though otherwise ZERO chance
Can someone put me on as to why there's such a long wait for Game 3 in the Warriors/Spurs series?
they werent better teams then the team they lost to..What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.
Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
2011 heat were the better team. 2016 warriors were the better team . 06 mavs were better then the heat etc etc
LOL, yeah okay.
Nike needs to stop messing around and give Draymond a sig.
There you go.LeBron didn't deserve a $90 million dollar Nike contract coming out of high school.
The reason he didn't call a timeout was he didn't want Lue to be able to take Love out for defense
What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.
Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
Still want a pair. They look comfortable to play in.
Easy pull of the trigger.
You honestly couldn't have drawn up a better play than the 2X MVP and reigning scoring champ getting an ISO on Kevin love. Curry honestly just choked.
The reason he didn't call a timeout was he didn't want Lue to be able to take Love out for defense
So what? There was 53 seconds left and the Cavs didn't have a time out. If Lue took out Love, there was no way for him to put him back into the game for offense unless there was a foul (GS was in the bonus) or timeout called.
Kerr should've called time out.
What you mean? I don't get it. I just answered you.
Those 3 teams lost back 2 back Finals. And they were all #1 seeds.
What? No man. WTF are you talking about?
Utah and Chicago had the same record, New Jersey was the #1 seed, but they had 6 less wins than the Lakers, and the 04's Lakers were the better team and lost. But the year after the Spurs beat the Pistons.
Get what I'm saying?
I don't think there has ever been a time in the NBA where the best team in the NBA Finals two years in a row.