- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Furthermore, why are all the edits always for the worse if thats the case?
its cost cutting for more profit at our expense.
its cost cutting for more profit at our expense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If anything it’s a smooth smooth nubuck. And tbh I’d be fine with that if they got everything else right.
they wouldnt be shooting themselves in the foot, that whole philosophy is stupid
No other company does that
I don’t think dropping a 1991 copy would hurt the next retro’s sales. We have to remember that the average person doesn’t much care or even know what the 1991 looked like. As time passes, many OG details get lost on the target market of 12-25 year olds. The general aesthetic is what is expected; a Black Jordan 6 with red hits. As long as the next release has a feature that’ll get folks hyped, it’ll sell. I remember 3m being a big selling point for the 2014. Even on NT, 3m was what made the shoe for many. For the next retro after 2019, if JB brought back the Varsity Rd and suede(nubuck) that’s a guaranteed sell out even as a GR.
With the Black Cement 3 for last year, to the average person, they were fine because the general aesthetic of a black tumbled leather Jordan 3 with grey elephant print, grey accents, and red accents was there. Add in the Nike air and the leather not being as stiff as the much scrutinized True Blue 3. Easy sell out. People didn’t know/care about the elephant print height and material, nor they they care about the shape.
Exactly, there’s no consistent logic. Jordan Brand knows the 3-6 can always be leaned on for money, they gotta keep folks coming back.I don’t know man, nobody really understands JB logic when it comes to this stuff. Retro before 2006 were good, and they all came in the same boxes. Now they could be better but they put a lot of effort in the boxes, so I don’t really see any cost savings. I’ll take my Infareds in a bag, if they come to me looking like ‘91s.
Exactly, there’s no consistent logic. Jordan Brand knows the 11 can always be leaned on for money, they gotta keep folks coming back.
No, I’m talking about the fact that 3-6 typically drop in multiple GRs each year and sell just as much if not more units. The 4 sold more units in 2017 than the 11. The 3 might have sold more units in 2018 than the 11 due to its multiple GRs.Fixed that for you
That’s not really a fair comparison because they don’t drop as many colorways of an 11 as they do a 3 or a 4 in a single year.
Yea but that was the most ever produced for an 11. 11 numbers haven’t been like that before this year.
Not the retail, but what you think?
Not the retail, but what you think?
They look like fakes I got screwed on several years ago.Yea those look wrong to me. Shape is off and looks like nubuck instead of durabuck.
Cue Tony. lolAnd why do so many not like the bc3 from last year?? I thought it was a great retro. Not perfect but easily the best one since the 2001’s.