- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,180
- 70,175
Facts.
Them joints sexy AF
Them joints sexy AF
2019 All Star Black Infrared Air Jordan 6
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Aquamanjay_,
- Start date
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,180
- 70,175
One of the few that I bought 2 pairs of.
Still got one chillin
Still got one chillin
- Dec 7, 2015
- 2,184
- 7,039
I need to get a second pair soon honestly.
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
not talking about tongue height im talking about the pregnancy of it
- Aug 9, 2012
- 3,635
- 8,162
The sheen on the tongue is pretty much the only thing I would change about them. Not worth complaining about though since the shoe was great overall. It’s lightyears ahead of anything else that came after 2001.
AWOKEN CHARISMA
formerly monopolize
- May 30, 2013
- 3,523
- 4,964
Them hanzuying pics posted still didnt prove whether they are potentially an official product or not.
They could even be just early samples for all anyone knows.
Last edited:
- Aug 14, 2014
- 2,100
- 2,130
Preach!
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,344
- 32,538
Concords got them beat. Metallics would’ve been perfect had they got the toebox right. Also the 3M was off
- Dec 7, 2018
- 2,267
- 5,926
2016 SJ and the new Concords are the best retros ever. There have been some other great ones though that did the og justice. The 2004 bred 13 comes to mind.
- Apr 7, 2013
- 5,258
- 7,923
Still have to double. One of my fav Jordan’s period
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,303
- 18,100
Concords crush those metallic 5s. But the 5s are solid other than that puffy tongue and its wrong sheen. It bugged me enough to skip them.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Hope these are on calendars soon
Last edited:
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,344
- 32,538
The sheen looks oily it’s supposed to be a dull 3M reflective. We all know what they were supposed to look like. I didn’t really mind that thick tongue
- May 27, 2017
- 990
- 5,463
That tongue is the only reason I’m contemplating to sell my 5’s cuz they look really OD on feet. Haven’t sold them yet cuz they look so good.
- Feb 28, 2004
- 1,246
- 2,174
I agree. I had the 99s and these were “almost” close. Very good quality and shape not gonna lie
- Jan 9, 2018
- 16
- 12
no pics of these yet?
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,344
- 32,538
- Mar 17, 2011
- 1,566
- 914
might have a cobbler or seamstress extend my toung about 2 inches or so, im sick of this short tounge bullsheet!
- Dec 1, 2012
- 1,803
- 1,933
Hoping they also nail the black cement IVs, need those bad boys with the durabuck white lining
- Jul 21, 2012
- 313
- 227
I don't understand the quality logic at Nike. I think the most retroed shoe, even though they make them all the time, is the Air Force One. I haven't seen poor quality pair yet.
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,189
- 7,410
Air Force One leather quality has been trash for the last 10 or so years. Pairs from the early 2000’s and Back was WAAAAAY better then the current AF1’s
- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,087
- 5,877
- Jul 21, 2012
- 313
- 227
I haven't really compared the leather in years. But from a cosmetic standpoint, they look the same...In my opinion. You kind of know what you're getting. The two shoes that had the worst leather to me are the retro black toe 14's and the nike air unlimited
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,628
- 23,573
This retro def took me back to 91. Thought it was a great release.I would be happy if the 2019 Infareds match the shape of my Maroons. And my tongue seems to be a little higher too
- Jul 18, 2018
- 420
- 494
I thought the most recent aqua and chrome 8s were well done.
