- 22,699
- 45,886
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
Imma wear these supreme dunks into the ground...(if they ship)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That is not true but okay lolI've always thought that about Supreme. All their stuff looks bland or devoid of creativity that has their brand label attached to them, but it causes a massive flock of people to fiend for their crap.
facts is facts. cookie cutter or not. u must be one of the supreme slobbers/fan boys. enjoy. also, jordans retros were original designs and were very creative. so much so that they single handedly changed the entire athletic footwear industry. so much so that 30+ years later millions of ppl are still buying. supreme on the other hand was NEVER creative or original so your "argument" is invalid. like what u like. supreme is straight uninspired garbage, but do you. and that's a difference bewteen us... i don't worship a logo, but you just stated you do. so there's that.2021 and dude still feel the need to regurgitate the same cookie cutter criticism about supreme I like a lot of their stuff, I dislike a lot of their stuff. They make so many different products between clothes, accessories, collabs, stuff with huge logos, stuff with barely any logos. Impossible to cast a generalization about their products. "If there was no logo..." like we're not all here shoving **** with emblazoned jumpman and swoosh logos down our throats every day. Y'all worship a different logo and try to clown on others who do the same
And if it wasn't for Supreme, Nike SB would probably not have developed into what it became. Likewise for Nike SB's benefit for Supreme.
As someone who’s been into SBs since the beginning, I gotta disagree. Sure, there’s a large swath of people that only like them because of the whole hyped culture that is Supreme, but the original two Supreme x SB collabs (2002 Low Elephant pairs and 2003 High Croc pairs that this new release is based on) are huge parts of the history of the SB line. A remix, or a low or high version of a SUPER HISTORICAL/CLASSIC SB would always be sought after by SB fans.these supremes are absolute garbage and literally no one would want these pieces of **** if the name supreme wasn't attached.
That is not true but okay lol
I know we're all salty about the Ls but let's not sit here and make up lies to feel better. Let's just move on.
the 1st supremes are also mediocre at best, but they started the supreme/nike hype so i get why they are heralded. those get a pass. everything after...As someone who’s been into SBs since the beginning, I gotta disagree. Sure, there’s a large swath of people that only like them because of the whole hyped culture that is Supreme, but the original two Supreme x SB collabs (2002 Low Elephant pairs and 2003 High Croc pairs that this new release is based on) are huge parts of the history of the SB line. A remix, or a low or high version of a SUPER HISTORICAL/CLASSIC SB would always be sought after by SB fans.
Supreme changed the landscape of consumerism surrounding skateboarding and streetwear. They ushered in the modern era of streetwear as we know it. 25+ years later and millions of people are buying it. They in fact did release an original design in collaboration with Nike SB, the Zoom Supreme 94 (it's actually pretty ugly, they do better reinterpreting what exists).They've commissioned the works of countless artists like Kaws, Mark Gonzales, Daniel Johnston, Damien Hurst, Adres Serrano, The Velvet Underground, Keith Haring, The Clash/Joe Strummer, Prodigy, Capone N Noreaga, etc. etc. Their original designs come in the forms of skateboard decks and apparel. Obviously they've done plenty of ripping off as well since that's their logo. But your ignorance is clearly showing no bounds because you don't seem to know anything about the brand and the pieces they've put out. And yes, the Jordan Brand legacy also extends into Supreme given the influence from the Jordan 3's influence on the dunks.facts is facts. cookie cutter or not. u must be one of the supreme slobbers/fan boys. enjoy. also, jordans retros were original designs and were very creative. so much so that they single handedly changed the entire athletic footwear industry. so much so that 30+ years later millions of ppl are still buying. supreme on the other hand was NEVER creative or original so your "argument" is invalid. like what u like. supreme is straight uninspired garbage, but do you. and that's a difference bewteen us... i don't worship a logo, but you just stated you do. so there's that.
I wouldn’t say all their stuff
they’re just very hit or miss
Yeah werd. Faux croc and stars were tacky back then and tacky now. I never liked the OG highs. Most supreme nikes are wack especially in comparison to OG dunks and OG blazers.The shade that got thrown on the original Supreme High top pairs sounded exactly like the shade that the lows are getting today...
~Gold stars and fake croc print~ ffs it seems like just yesterday ...
IMO the first Supreme SBs, the Low Black/Cement and White/Cements, are dope. Putting the classic Jordan elephant print on an SB was dope. I personally prefer these cements to the following years Highs, but those were dope too IMO. SBs have come in some wild and weird combinations, and the original Supreme Highs (and now these lows) aren’t really all that outlandish in the grand landscape of SBs. I’m personally not a big fan of Supreme’s clothing and stuff (just own 3 monotone beanies without contrasting branding or anything), but any re-creation of their first two collabs on Dunk SBs is a big deal.the 1st supremes are also mediocre at best, but they started the supreme/nike hype so i get why they are heralded. those get a pass. everything after...
One of the greatest L’s ever