48÷2(9+3) = ???

[jchambers]

Still?

 

[jchambers]

Still?

 

[chihigh91]

I'm about to make a shirt that says 48÷2(9+3) = ???

 

[chihigh91]

I'm about to make a shirt that says 48÷2(9+3) = ???

 

[ryanbbn23]

what the hell is that?

and why doesnt the chef respond to getting a bullet to the belly?

 

[ryanbbn23]

what the hell is that?

and why doesnt the chef respond to getting a bullet to the belly?

 

[240Zestways]

Originally Posted by Just bLAzed

Originally Posted by DanzInRealLife




Sup, my calculator says it's 2.


Oh and it also says 9.

you're using a Casio calculator, though. #poor
try it on a TI calculator

#poor

 

[240Zestways]

Originally Posted by Just bLAzed

Originally Posted by DanzInRealLife




Sup, my calculator says it's 2.


Oh and it also says 9.

you're using a Casio calculator, though. #poor
try it on a TI calculator

#poor

 

[elpablo21]

Originally Posted by JChambers

Still?

 So random

 

[elpablo21]

Originally Posted by JChambers

Still?

 So random

 

[bc2310]

 

[bc2310]

 

[late registrant]

 

[late registrant]

 

[ryanbbn23]

can anyone solve:
(3+9)2÷48
[h3]
[/h3]

 

[ryanbbn23]

can anyone solve:
(3+9)2÷48
[h3]
[/h3]

 

[brianilla]

2.

solve inside the parenthesis first.
then follow the rule MDAS. mult, div, add, subt.

 

[brianilla]

2.

solve inside the parenthesis first.
then follow the rule MDAS. mult, div, add, subt.

 

[danzinreallife]

Originally Posted by BananaBoy2601

Originally Posted by DanzInRealLife




Sup, my calculator says it's 2.


Oh and it also says 9.

Sup, your calculator doesn't have order of operations written in it's source code.

Oh and math says its 288

There's nothing wrong with my source code.

You'll find that it's how you're answering the equation that is the problem as per BC2310's video.

2's are answering it how it is written, 288's are answering it differently.

Proof:




My #poor calculator >>> *

 

[danzinreallife]

Originally Posted by BananaBoy2601

Originally Posted by DanzInRealLife




Sup, my calculator says it's 2.


Oh and it also says 9.

Sup, your calculator doesn't have order of operations written in it's source code.

Oh and math says its 288

There's nothing wrong with my source code.

You'll find that it's how you're answering the equation that is the problem as per BC2310's video.

2's are answering it how it is written, 288's are answering it differently.

Proof:




My #poor calculator >>> *

 

[lpheat22]

109 pages though? Is a Kobe release going on in here?

 

[lpheat22]

109 pages though? Is a Kobe release going on in here?

 

[guskillah]

http://www.youtube.com/wa...r_embedded&v=wv19iAncrrQ
idk if the video was uploaded already and i dont know how to embedded so yeaaah.

 

[guskillah]

http://www.youtube.com/wa...r_embedded&v=wv19iAncrrQ
idk if the video was uploaded already and i dont know how to embedded so yeaaah.

 

[balloonoboy]