48÷2(9+3) = ???

Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.

- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
 
Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.

- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]
 
Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.

You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
 
Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.

You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
 
Originally Posted by Young Safari

Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.

- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]

Says the guy who probably goes to H&R Block and gets a refund anticipation loan.
 
Originally Posted by Young Safari

Math sucks, no matter was the real answer is... neither of it actually applies to my real life.

- Safari [emoji]174[/emoji]

Says the guy who probably goes to H&R Block and gets a refund anticipation loan.
 
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc

2(12)=2*12

cmon people
 
yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc

2(12)=2*12

cmon people
 
Originally Posted by cguy610

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Nope.     2(9+3)   is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)
..........
alien.gif

Yes it is.
2(9+3) = 2 x (9+3) = 2 x 1(9+3) = 2 x (12) = 2(12) = 2 x 12 = 2(4+8+311) = 24

Originally Posted by dmbrhs

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.

You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
I'm sorry man but you do not comprehend how the P in PEMDAS works.
It is what is INSIDE the parentheses. Not what is attached. The 2 is not attached. There is no "In Theory" to this. The 2 is multiplied by what is within it. And has no precedence just because it is next to a set of parentheses. You are wrong, no need to make a corny joke.
 
Originally Posted by cguy610

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Nope.     2(9+3)   is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)
..........
alien.gif

Yes it is.
2(9+3) = 2 x (9+3) = 2 x 1(9+3) = 2 x (12) = 2(12) = 2 x 12 = 2(4+8+311) = 24

Originally Posted by dmbrhs

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3). Therefore after adding 9+3, you work from LEFT to RIGHT.
In theory, sure. You use a process of multiplication to distribute the 2 in order to get rid of the parentheses. As the problem is written, the 2 is attached. The ONLY way it is NOT attached is if there is another symbol between it and the parentheses. You are not breaking the order of operations by "multiplying" the 2. You're still at the parenthetical stage.

You guys are not following through with the P in PEMDAS...maybe ya'll just want to get to the D so bad?
I'm sorry man but you do not comprehend how the P in PEMDAS works.
It is what is INSIDE the parentheses. Not what is attached. The 2 is not attached. There is no "In Theory" to this. The 2 is multiplied by what is within it. And has no precedence just because it is next to a set of parentheses. You are wrong, no need to make a corny joke.
 
Originally Posted by cguy610

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Nope.     2(9+3)   is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)

yet, this is one of your allies main arguments...

and for the record, they are 'equal to' each other...because both equal 24...however, you can't completely remove them from the rest of the equation.

-waystinthyme
 
Originally Posted by cguy610

Originally Posted by HyphySole

 Writing 2(9+3) is the same as 2 x (9+3).
Nope.     2(9+3)   is not equal to 2 x 1(9+3)

yet, this is one of your allies main arguments...

and for the record, they are 'equal to' each other...because both equal 24...however, you can't completely remove them from the rest of the equation.

-waystinthyme
 
I teach high school math and the discussion in here is pretty funny.
laugh.gif


Multiply OR Divide LEFT to RIGHT and both rank equally meaning you don't have to multiply first because it comes first in PEMDAS!
roll.gif
. Keyword is "OR."

You don't multiply the 2 just because of distribution. It will always be LEFT to RIGHT!
 
I teach high school math and the discussion in here is pretty funny.
laugh.gif


Multiply OR Divide LEFT to RIGHT and both rank equally meaning you don't have to multiply first because it comes first in PEMDAS!
roll.gif
. Keyword is "OR."

You don't multiply the 2 just because of distribution. It will always be LEFT to RIGHT!
 
Originally Posted by 2g00d4u

yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc

2(12)=2*12

cmon people
As a part of the distributive property, which satisfies the parentheses...then you can move on.
 
Originally Posted by 2g00d4u

yeah, theres this misconception with 2(9+3) and 2(12) or #(#), #(#+#), etc

2(12)=2*12

cmon people
As a part of the distributive property, which satisfies the parentheses...then you can move on.
 
Back
Top Bottom