Originally Posted by ESyDC
Poor TNA. They put on a great show and still not impressive enough for some.Poor DoubleJ, should have def been 1st in. That triple threat match.
Don't forget JR. WWE takes shots at him every chance they get. Look at this week's Smackdown. Just like Vickie, JR has lost a ton of weight, so they insult his bells palsy this week by having Hornswoggle talk out the side of his mouth. It's disgusting.
Originally Posted by 4wrestling
Originally Posted by ESyDC
Poor TNA. They put on a great show and still not impressive enough for some.Poor DoubleJ, should have def been 1st in. That triple threat match.
Not poor TNA. Poor fools who won't give TNA, the far superior wrestling product to WWE, a shot. It's their own loss.
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]i vividly remember Oklahoma in WCW... and how EVERYONE was wanting to take their heads off... How dare someone make fun of a man with bells palsy, How dare they go after an ex-employee and treat him that way.[/color]
Originally Posted by im that one
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]i vividly remember Oklahoma in WCW... and how EVERYONE was wanting to take their heads off... How dare someone make fun of a man with bells palsy, How dare they go after an ex-employee and treat him that way.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]Funny how things come around huh... When Dr. Death and Oklahoma do it, NOT ok... But dammit we let a little person with a bottle of bbq sauce and it's Hilarious!.... it's all poor taste. [/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]and that's coming from a guy who was/is HEAVY into ECW and their storylines. speaking of which I really didn't agree with How they set up their Vol. 1 of their ECW dvd. It could have been done a lot better, they dropped the ball imo. I had 10 matches at the top of my head, saw 1. Also i would have done the volumes by year or from early to last. just me .02 cents.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]yes i know the title, but it's WWE Unreleased. I've seen most of those matches and those matches have been shown. So it's not a true UNRELEASED dvd meaning people haven't seen them. Plus, like i said, structure wise i would have done it by early years and so on. Would have been better with it being in Volumes. [/color]Originally Posted by YardFather
Originally Posted by im that one
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]i vividly remember Oklahoma in WCW... and how EVERYONE was wanting to take their heads off... How dare someone make fun of a man with bells palsy, How dare they go after an ex-employee and treat him that way.[/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]Funny how things come around huh... When Dr. Death and Oklahoma do it, NOT ok... But dammit we let a little person with a bottle of bbq sauce and it's Hilarious!.... it's all poor taste. [/color]
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]and that's coming from a guy who was/is HEAVY into ECW and their storylines. speaking of which I really didn't agree with How they set up their Vol. 1 of their ECW dvd. It could have been done a lot better, they dropped the ball imo. I had 10 matches at the top of my head, saw 1. Also i would have done the volumes by year or from early to last. just me .02 cents.[/color]
The thing about that DVD is that it is ECW UNRELEASED Vol. 1. The great/memorable ECW matches that everyone has seen are already out on DVD. I enjoyed this DVD for the fact that it wasn't just the usual matches we all know and have seen.
Originally Posted by Mr DragonFly Jones
4w is becoming NTWT's Skip Bayless.
TNA has been much improved though. Still wouldn't put it over WWE...no bias
Originally Posted by Peep Game
The amount of slander just tossed around like nothing is amazingOriginally Posted by toine2983
I know WWE has put a lot of foolishness on TV over the years, but man WCW.
Buff Bagwell taking a swing at his old lady.
Too much real life with that Hogan comment.
Sid.
Originally Posted by im that one
Originally Posted by hombrelobo
Originally Posted by Mr DragonFly Jones
4w is becoming NTWT's Skip Bayless.
TNA has been much improved though. Still wouldn't put it over WWE...no bias
This.
Last night's show was very impressive, though. Very. If you're a wrestling fan, I don't see why you wouldn't give TNA a shot right now. It's probably the best the product has been in over 4 years.
For the record on the TNA HOF induction.. I wouldn't have put JJ in first. I know I'm the biggest JJ mark here and to say the least.. there would have been too much backlash if he was in first. No one can hate on Sting getting into the TNA HOF. Additionally, despite the fact that JJ got TNA off the ground, it's arguable that Sting had a bigger overall impact on the product itself.
if you are arguing that, then Kurt Angle had a bigger impact and should have been first.
In ring, yes I agree. I'm talking overall leadership & contributions, though. Including behind the scenes. There's a reason why Sting does conference calls with the company, and not Angle. He's just that kind of go to guy that TNA has needed/needs to grow the company.
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]Then it would be JJ... Because of TV is why he is in there first. Did JJ have a say in this to put Stinger in, I'm sure he did. But He should have been first. That would be the RIGHT choice. The business choice because of timing and TV is Sting... But before JJ, AJ, and Angle... again, No.[/color]
