- 37,621
- 31,883
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
forget about the U and ASU ones. Those actually were thought out. All others were basically scrap of other versions with something tiny added
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They're legit as they come, SKU BB4677. I got them off GOAT a few months ago and consider myself pretty good at doing LCs on UBs at this point, so I have no doubt mine are legit.@tankdayglo .. are your triple black 1.0 legit ? Or it was a custom paint job ?
They're legit as they come, SKU BB4677. I got them off GOAT a few months ago and consider myself pretty good at doing LCs on UBs at this point, so I have no doubt mine are legit.
Adidas seems to have produced an initial run of them w/ prod date 2/16, which is what mine are from, that have the bottom of the boost painted black. The pairs releasing now, which leave the bottom of the boost white, have prod date of 8/16.
My assumption is that adidas planned on releasing the TBs from the 2/16 run back when they were initially slated to drop (can't even remember the initial date now it's changed so many times, think it was April), but in the meantime found a "better" (aka cheaper) method of painting the midsole, so they shelved/seeded out the 2/16 pairs and used the new paint method on the uncaged LTDs as well as this new, second batch of TBs releasing now.
But that's just me theorizing, I don't think we'll ever know what truly happened. Heck, adidas probably doesn't even know themselves. The paint is def slightly different on my pair compared to these new ones and the paint on the uncaged LTDs boost. My paint is slightly more rubbery looking while the new paint seems to be slightly more dry. Minimal difference in the overall look though. Unless you look at the outsole haha.
I think someone tweeted it at them and the highly-knowledgeable unpaid intern running the @adidasrunning twitter account said they looked like customs
didn't Adidas retweet Tank's triple black ub 1.0 picture? lol I'm pretty sure they're real too
Nah the certified genius running the adidasrunning twitter account that day said they looked like customs, I showed them a pic of the size tag w/ the SKU on it and they didn't have anything else to say.
didn't Adidas retweet Tank's triple black ub 1.0 picture? lol I'm pretty sure they're real too
9.5 and way too much.Nice ... may I ask what size and how much ?
Oneness released the 1.0 alreadyI'm starting to think the only triple black UB releasing will be the 3.0
Oneness released the 1.0 already
I hope its still 1.0 then they will release 3.0Yea I know I have them but we'll see if they get a WIDE release
View media item 2213717
View media item 2213718
View media item 2213719
LC on these? Seller asking $80
I'm starting to think the only triple black UB releasing will be the 3.0
Never bought used UBs. General bad past experiences? or just the case for UBs?Looks legit, but I don't consider myself an expert on this subject. However, I do not recommend buying used shoes unless they are some ultra rare holy grails.
Nope never bought used shoes. Closest was when I used to get hand-me-downs from my cousins when I was a kid. I just get down with buying shoes with another man's sweat and odor on them. :x especially if they are shoes that are readily available. If you can't afford them yet, then just save or buy a different shoe until you can afford them.Never bought used UBs. General bad past experiences? or just the case for UBs?Looks legit, but I don't consider myself an expert on this subject. However, I do not recommend buying used shoes unless they are some ultra rare holy grails.
I'm starting to think the only triple black UB releasing will be the 3.0
Oneness released the 1.0 already
It's gotta be.Yea I know I have thembut we'll see if they get a WIDE release