- 3,702
- 2,837
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Looks like Teddy "Boost God" dead center - looking for some retail Kiths to go with his samples...
I would've agreed with you, but we would be wrong
I made a purchase recently. It was bought on 12/3 and arrived in hand on 12/10. Not bad considering that the seller must ship it to stockx first.
What's the timeframe it takes for StockX orders? Bought a pair of RC's for $374 - $25 first time coupon after selling those Purecontrol UBs.
edit: Read the FAQ and it says 7-9 business days.
I've got 10s in both and they're the same length IMO. The wools are more loose though, I can roll my toes much easier in the wools than the cores.
can someone comment on wool 1.0's fit versus core 1.0 fit?
are wool's as tight? longer?
edit: i searched and found a couple posts saying they are "looser" than the core's
- true???
yes
can someone comment on wool 1.0's fit versus core 1.0 fit?
are wool's as tight? longer?
edit: i searched and found a couple posts saying they are "looser" than the core's
- true???
in your pic you can see the whole upper 50% of the shoe is a slightly 'thicker' silhouette. Even the toe box profile is larger. Could just be the angle though.
1.0 vs 3.0 Greys. I need more pairs lol. 3.0 is way more loose fit wise.
Pretty crazy how much the silhouette has changed. 1.0 looks more 'sleek' and aggressive. 3.0 looks bulky in comparison. No surprise they fit looser.
1.0 vs 3.0 Greys. I need more pairs lol. 3.0 is way more loose fit wise.
it's surprisingly roomy for 3.0s, i have 1.0s from US8.5-9.5, including the creams which fit bigger. This 3.0 takes the cake.
in your pic you can see the whole upper 50% of the shoe is a slightly 'thicker' silhouette. Even the toe box profile is larger. Could just be the angle though.
Part of it is definitely the angle.
in your pic you can see the whole upper 50% of the shoe is a slightly 'thicker' silhouette. Even the toe box profile is larger. Could just be the angle though.
That's him trying to get close to Fieg. Trying to get in on the F&F edition lol.
Looks like Teddy "Boost God" dead center - looking for some retail Kiths to go with his samples...
Really hoping 3.0 eliminates the foot bridge discomfort...
damn... sure hope ground beef ships... thats a game changer... lolTotally does, it's the main reason I'm digging them so much.
Looks like space jams are going back if this ships... Just checked out... LOL
View media item 2263305
10... Sill on the fencesize of Space Jams?
Yea, can't wait to try on my 3.0s when I get them in and compare the fits. Hopefully I keep them. Would like to continue to spend my tax return on some 3.0s. Sitting out end of 2016 was kind of difficult with the 2.0s.
Part of it is definitely the angle.
You can see half way across the "tongue" for the laces in the 3.0, but can't even fully see the viewer's side of the cage on the 1.0's.
You can also see "inside" of the 3.0, yet cannot see any of the interior of the 1.0
really bothers me that the "Space Jams" aren't 1:1 with the original release
10... Sill on the fence