- 244
- 14
Copped x2. I need to find a discount. I don't believe in paying anymore than $99.99 for any retro 1!
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First off looks like you didn't even really try to read and comprehend what I said but just pin point one thing and take it personal smh. The laces really you bring up the lacing should be green as if someone cant simply switch that or not even knowing if it comes with green laces and also black laces were on the og chicagos as black so you saying all this og stuff but leave that out why? Did I not say these and the Cavs and so on used the shoe they wore as a BASE do you know what a base is because it certainly isnt mimicking the shoe.How is that the same colorblocking as these? Anyone?!
Black tongue with gold accents around the sockliner... compared to the all white tongue of the OG Chicago 1.... uhhh, not the same. The OG had an all white tongue with a white tag, and no accents in on the back of the tongue or the liner. Sure, they replaced the black swoosh with gold, but the outsole is gold too. If they were mimicking the OG, the outsole should be green to match the upper. The laces should also be green. The logo should still be black (the same color as the leather on the heel and surrounding the main upper color).
The two don't correlate at all, other than being 1's. And I stand by my opinion that green + black + gold together makes this look like an Irish colorway, but not that of the Boston Celtics.
So your comment wasn't run ons ether lol the one comment I type like you, you choose not to read it pricelessI can't even make it through that blabbering set of run-on sentences. I made my point pretty clearly, you're missing it. Just keep it moving cause I'm done having any sort of rational discussion with you.
So your comment wasn't run ons ether lol the one comment I type like you, you choose not to read it priceless
and though I'm highly against the smiley in situations like this I just had too how ignorant of a statement was this. Like you said I'ma keep it moving because it's clear you have nothing for me as all my points are above your comment and from the get go I said respect your opinion just doesn't make sense in an arguing fashion.
"Black tongue with gold accents around the sockliner... compared to the all white tongue of the OG Chicago 1.... uhhh, not the same."You don't even know what a run-on sentence is? Paragraphs are not run-ons. I think this says it all here. Periods are your friend. Can't have a discussion with people who can't read or write properly.
Again, the above logo used is not the color scheme of the logo in the 80's, which was green and white (like the other club logo that was used for decades prior). I don't think this guy can read.
Why do they have to use the logo from the 80s again?
Why would it just be a green and white shoe? No point of having another green and black (and or white) shoe because there would be nothing to set aside this pair from the DMP 1's besides the NA logo. How boring is that.
Celtics won the championship that year. Perhaps the inclusion of gold is a nod to that fact.Again, the above logo used is not the color scheme of the logo in the 80's, which was green and white (like the other club logo that was used for decades prior). I don't think this guy can read.
Celtics Logo 1978 - 1995
View media item 301612
I agree the DMP is def better than these. It would be cool if they re retroed the DMP one with nike air on it. But these aren't too bad at all they are just nothing special.imo DMP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these... easy pass...
I got thr Phat version of those. Only phats I ever got. They are beaters now. Close to throwin em away. Phts irk me.