- Aug 15, 2012
- 2,093
- 2,503
Air Jordan 39 (XXXIX) (July 23, 2024 Release date)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kyngpen413,
- Start date
- Aug 15, 2012
- 2,093
- 2,503
I wonder why Banchero isn’t wearing them anymore..?
- Jun 23, 2021
- 513
- 966
What was he wearing?
- Aug 15, 2012
- 2,093
- 2,503
Luka 2
- May 30, 2018
- 3,118
- 9,340
Last edited:
- May 12, 2022
- 191
- 835
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
Man you make it look so easy. Can you do a bulls colorway like the 11sWhat would everyone like to see with technology or packaging? With Jason Mayden back wouldn’t it be sweet if they retroed these?
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
The 38s are ugly and just ridiculous compared to 8s lol.
- Oct 7, 2012
- 358
- 304
Mike would have killed the NBA in these. Lol they need to be made.
Nike designers suck.
- May 12, 2003
- 4,961
- 8,577
I don’t understand why people would want these to look like an updated 9. The subtle nods are plenty. Just get some 9s if you want them.
- Aug 26, 2012
- 3,705
- 5,048
- Jan 27, 2013
- 14,798
- 26,202
Flagship of a billion dollar company and thats what you get. Just so so weak.
I hope there’s some kind of twist or that they are the best feeling best performing lightest fastest bounciest jordans ever made, cause on appearance alone, all these colorways are weaksauce. I hope there is some twist that makes them dope
I hope there’s some kind of twist or that they are the best feeling best performing lightest fastest bounciest jordans ever made, cause on appearance alone, all these colorways are weaksauce. I hope there is some twist that makes them dope
- Mar 31, 2013
- 1,069
- 1,756
Only 9 colorways? Or just 9 for the Olympics?
- Mar 16, 2020
- 3,442
- 6,665
Looks like a fisher price boat with a plain shoe inside of it.
Well said...
Fixed.
As a sneaker enthusiast you can kind of tell if a sneaker will make some kind of an impact on history years to come. These 39s are doing the opposite. Nobody will beg for these to retro in the future.
- May 10, 2013
- 22,781
- 29,517
You could arguably say that for every sig Jordan didn’t wear.
- Dec 9, 2002
- 34,665
- 28,027
I'm convinced, these were supposed to be the CP's had he won the chip 3yrs ago. 100% looks like something from his line. Nothing about these look like a Roman numeral edition.
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,307
- 18,138
- May 10, 2013
- 22,781
- 29,517
Yea those are even worse than the 39 we actually got. Lol
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,086
- 14,345
What made the sig line so special, IMO, is the perfect balance of function and performance, coupled with casual appeal. We haven't had that really since the xx3, which is also when I think the sig line shoulda ended.
It woulda been a perfect ending like his last shot in Utah to capture that 6th and final ring.
It woulda been a perfect ending like his last shot in Utah to capture that 6th and final ring.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,233
- 10,913
We haven’t really had that with any basketball shoe in 15+ years. It’s not a Jordan thing. It’s the tech evolving to a point where these synthetic mesh and plastics will never carry casual appeal.
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,086
- 14,345
These are actually not bad. I'd rock em...
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,086
- 14,345
It's not necessarily the materials, imo. It's the terrible designs.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,233
- 10,913
Most of the designs are terrible for casual wear, dunno about basketball. I think they work fine for that. Dudes trying to wear AEs and Hardens out to the bar like that works. None of these current basketball shoes have any casual appeal. I guess they tried for that with the Book 1 but that failed in both directions.
I think beyond oversaturation of retros, runners and the other brands have succeeded lately purely based on being an alternative to ugly modern basketball shoes
- May 10, 2013
- 22,781
- 29,517
Not quite sure how they failed with the Book 1 with that one.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,233
- 10,913
It’s neither a performance shoe nor a good looking casual shoe. Not to mention the guy’s personal brand is a joke
