Air Jordan 4 "Dunk From Above" To Release (3/19/16)

Can't wait for these. I love how it has a yellow lining on the inside of the navy leather, so that when they are cut the yellow outline shows up. View media item 1569949
The only other Jays I seen do that are the the Ray Allen 11 "2 Rings".
The gold patent leather has a red interior, so it had a red outline. Awesome touch!!!

IIRC the OG powder caro IX's were lined in Caro on the upper I think.....may have been a hint of caro color there....
 
I tried putting them side by side. Angles aren't perfect but can still come away with a few minute differences.

View media item 1570421
View media item 1570429
Definite:
Not only did they fix the lace tabs but it looks a lot more secure/stable looking at the base. Basically means that those triangles aren't for show but for durability too. I also noticed that the netting is thicker. Leather also looks thicker/edges are frayed instead of rounded over.

Unclear due to angle:
The gap on the base of the wings on the 2016 pair looks to be shorter. They also look a tad thicker. I also believe the air bubble looks compact but thicker if that makes sense. Also that minor shape difference along the midsole. However like stated, these all could just be the angles.

I like your optimism, but im cynical when it comes to JB. Size may play a huge factor on those differences.
 
I don't understand why people prefer the OG look of the tabs (the triangular "supports").  I'm all about OG, and the 4s hold a special nostalgic meaning to me as they were my first jordan's in '89, and my first Nike's with visible air.  However, I see the OG tabs as a manufacturing limitation and/or required due to the available plastics at the time (i.e. not strong enough).  Getting rid of that looks so much better.  The OG really looks like: "Oh, they couldn't figure out how to manufacture it without that there."  I'm sure Tinker never saw that as a design element.  Would love to see the mesh fixed.  I recall fakes used to be identified by the mesh not being parallel to the wings, and the wings being flimsy.  Now the retros look just like the fakes used to, and the wings are flimsy; so sad.

Same with NA vs. jumpman.  Either Tinker didn't think of it, he wanted/needed to leverage the Nike brand as the JB didn't exist, or Nike wouldn't allow it.  Guaranteed he would have put the jumpman on otherwise.  I personally think it makes the back look better (less bulky/fat looking).  I'll buy them either way, but happy to pay less and get the jumpman.  I'm more about the original shape.  For example, I'm not liking the taller tongue; throws off the look and feel.  And prefer the more slanted toe box (not banana).  Make those changes, along with the mesh angle, wing thickness, and I don't care about the tabs and jumpman!  

All in all, I'm happy to see so many 4s, as I didn't start re-collecting until '13 (yes, about 23 years later!), and missed ALL of the OG 4 colorways....so sad!
 
I have to agree with the fellow cynics that are skeptical of JB's ability to get the mold close to an OG shape/style.

It's going to be difficult, for the most part and stylistically, they have always gotten the shape of the "mid cut" off and the toe piece that wraps around, it's been significantly reduced and misaligned on newer versions. The infamous banana shape still seems to be in tact.

Below are some examples of what I mean:
View media item 1572295View media item 1572296View media item 1572297
 
I find it hard to believe that JB doesnt see that banana shoe crap.  I believe that they dont want to correct it.  Looks horrible..
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why people prefer the OG look of the tabs (the triangular "supports").  

Same with NA vs. jumpman.  Either Tinker didn't think of it, he wanted/needed to leverage the Nike brand as the JB didn't exist, or Nike wouldn't allow it.  Guaranteed he would have put the jumpman on otherwise.

Because true enthusiasts of many things collectable perfer things 100% true to form. Thats why you see guys spending an extra hundred on factory car items rather than the $9 reproduction item.

If I'm not mistaken Tinker loved the Nike Air branding. I know one of his fav parts was adding/finding the placement of the logo on each sneaker. Plus JB got their solo brand in 98 and didn't stamp the jumpman til 03. It was a matter of trying to distance themselves.
 
Because true enthusiasts of many things collectable perfer things 100% true to form. Thats why you see guys spending an extra hundred on factory car items rather than the $9 reproduction item.

If I'm not mistaken Tinker loved the Nike Air branding. I know one of his fav parts was adding/finding the placement of the logo on each sneaker. Plus JB got their solo brand in 98 and didn't stamp the jumpman til 03. It was a matter of trying to distance themselves.
Good points.  I wonder if there's anyone who actually doesn't know that JB=Nike.  Unlike other brands where many lay people remain oblivious (ex. Porsche-VW, Audi-Labo that share many of the same parts).  From a corp strategy perspective, it makes sense.  That said, for retros, I could see honoring OG could be seen as acceptable.  Nike appears to agree given the elevated price they get to charge!
 
IMO, I do think that the mold will look better but not perfect. Just getting those lace tabs right makes me happier.

BUT... Unless they are going to be made in Taiwan, I think we are still gonna see an overall IV that is still lacking in some aspects.
 
geraldg2309 geraldg2309 ^^^ :hat

Because true enthusiasts of many things collectable perfer things 100% true to form. Thats why you see guys spending an extra hundred on factory car items rather than the $9 reproduction item.


If I'm not mistaken Tinker loved the Nike Air branding. I know one of his fav parts was adding/finding the placement of the logo on each sneaker. Plus JB got their solo brand in 98 and didn't stamp the jumpman til 03. It was a matter of trying to distance themselves.
Good points.  I wonder if there's anyone who actually doesn't know that JB=Nike.  Unlike other brands where many lay people remain oblivious (ex. Porsche-VW, Audi-Labo that share many of the same parts).  From a corp strategy perspective, it makes sense.  That said, for retros, I could see honoring OG could be seen as acceptable.  Nike appears to agree given the elevated price they get to charge!

Believe me, the average consumer doesn't even know JB is under Nike. I remember shopping at a shoe store, and betting these store managers that swore JB was a separate brand. I flipped to the bottom side of the box where the Nike stickers are and they had stonefaces.
 
Last edited:
@geraldg2309 ^^^
pimp.gif

Believe me, the average consumer doesn't even know JB is under Nike. I remember shopping at a shoe store, and betting these store managers that swore JB was a separate brand. I flipped to the bottom side of the box where the Nike stickers are and they had stonefaces.
Wow....unbelievably pathetic!  Or really fantastic branding on Nike's behalf!  Even shoe store managers, eh?....I'm speechless....
 
Let me the first to call these "Laney 4s".... The badge on the tongue makes me wonder how much nonsense is coming with these release. I'm sure the gum sole will have Some ppl whining , but like in nascar the turn will come. I'm all in
 
These are the only shoes I like and copping out of the whole 2016 pack. Maybe I'll like a few others later but these will be a definite 2x.
 
Shape is slightly different from recent 4's. Especially the toe box area. 

Or maybe I'm on drugs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom