- 8,274
- 2,165
the 3s haven't changed since the 2011 mold. I expect these to be the same as the 2011s but with NA on the back
Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by palma,
- Start date
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Mold def got worse than 2011
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,534
- 9,570
- 1,270
- 369
Ok dang it
Should I wear my True Blues tomorrow to celebrate these dropping 2018
Or should I wear Air Max 95 Yankees
Should I wear my True Blues tomorrow to celebrate these dropping 2018
Or should I wear Air Max 95 Yankees
- 10,625
- 23,552
Can you show how because I agree with cashmOneyand1.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Most of the time I notice things others don’t but that’s because I’m a detail buff. The overall shape from a far looks similar but things def changed. In the ankle/heel area, the sock liner has a steeper dip. The EP is also thicker and higher. It’s also more angled with straight lines on the 2011. My 2016 Ep is not. The toe box also looks taller and wider on the new retros. Don’t like doing these explanations like this these days, but y’all made it seem as tho what I said was ludicrous. Y’all can’t see but I def can. The mold difference is even more apparent on the cyber Monday pair
Last edited:
- 759
- 1,051
Most of the time I notice things others don’t but that’s because I’m a detail buff. The overall shape from a far looks similar but things def changed. In the ankle/heel area, the sock liner has a steeper dip. The EP is also thicker and higher. It’s also more angled with straight lines on the 2013. My 2016 Ep is not. The toe box also looks taller and wider on the new retros. Don’t like doing these explanations like this these days, but y’all made it seem as tho what I said was ludicrous. Y’all can’t see but I def can. The mold difference is even more apparent on the cyber Monday pair
The steeper dip really changes the look. Even though theyre the same height 11 has the illusion of being way more of a hightop shoe and makes them look more white. I could never have spotted how different they are without the last pic. I definitely prefer '16 personally after.
D
Deleted member 42060
Guest
What made jb think to make the ep thicker
Since the orig 88s
Since the orig 88s
- 14,892
- 20,183
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- 6,765
- 13,602
Honestly, this is a trash to trash comparison, 3s havent been proper from a shape/build/materials perspective since the 2003 white cements. Granted, these are all better than the 2007 Fire Reds, those are an absolute ABOMINATION.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Y’all done lost me now......
D
Deleted member 42060
Guest
2009 above
- 8,274
- 2,165
Well then so much for “remastered” quality. I don’t expect much from JB.
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,139
- 13,396
The shape looks how much better with a shoe tree in in.
- 10,625
- 23,552
I don't think it's ludicrous at all. I see the differences you pointed out. I just don't think they are that huge to say the mold is so much worse.
Most of the time I notice things others don’t but that’s because I’m a detail buff. The overall shape from a far looks similar but things def changed. In the ankle/heel area, the sock liner has a steeper dip. The EP is also thicker and higher. It’s also more angled with straight lines on the 2011. My 2016 Ep is not. The toe box also looks taller and wider on the new retros. Don’t like doing these explanations like this these days, but y’all made it seem as tho what I said was ludicrous. Y’all can’t see but I def can. The mold difference is even more apparent on the cyber Monday pair
- 1,270
- 369
Most of the time I notice things others don’t but that’s because I’m a detail buff. The overall shape from a far looks similar but things def changed. In the ankle/heel area, the sock liner has a steeper dip. The EP is also thicker and higher. It’s also more angled with straight lines on the 2011. My 2016 Ep is not. The toe box also looks taller and wider on the new retros. Don’t like doing these explanations like this these days, but y’all made it seem as tho what I said was ludicrous. Y’all can’t see but I def can. The mold difference is even more apparent on the cyber Monday pair
I can't differentiate
I have both Cyber Monday & True Blues
They look the same to me
And I actually like more tall, higher toebox & EP, that is the Jordan 3 I saw on Mike Finely's foot in early 2000s
I'm just not an OG head....... Here's a game worn Jordan 3 OG.
Oh btw I would also purchase Sport Blues when they come out again.
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,534
- 9,570
I can't differentiate
I have both Cyber Monday & True Blues
They look the same to me
And I actually like more tall, higher toebox & EP, that is the Jordan 3 I saw on Mike Finely's foot in early 2000s
I'm just not an OG head....... Here's a game worn Jordan 3 OG.
Oh btw I would also purchase Sport Blues when they come out again.
Those are the first retro, not the original 1988 shoe
- 9,854
- 34,294
If dude thought those were OG's he need to get all the way the hell outta here.
- 1,104
- 1,478
Word!
- 1,104
- 1,478
If dude thought those were OG's he need to get all the way the hell outta here.
WORD!
- 8,799
- 10,386
Not the first retro either...
Technically they ARE OGs. Just like space jams from 2000 would be considered OG
Wait. Nevermind, the Jumpman isn't copper. He must've worn those with the bullets gear.
Carry on. I'm dumb
- 9,854
- 34,294
The hell?! Even if they were the copper colored Jumpan PE's he wore, they are not OG's. Stop it. That would be a retro + colorway/PE.
Scroll to the top of the page....those are OG's. 1988 Jordan III's = OG's.
Scroll to the top of the page....those are OG's. 1988 Jordan III's = OG's.
- 14,892
- 20,183
2000 Space Jams aren't OG either wtf
wtf
- 70,049
- 24,223
umm da 1996 PE were da OG's...
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,534
- 9,570
It's funny to hear some NT'rs talk about original releases
Last edited:
