- Nov 7, 2014
- 2,718
- 9,091
Now THIS is what we should've got this year!!!
It's REALLY ****** up too, because Nike was MORE than capable of doing so.
Last edited:
Air Jordan IV “Black/Cement” - May 4th 2019
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
Now THIS is what we should've got this year!!!
- Dec 7, 2018
- 2,267
- 5,926
Incredible.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
I'm a big fan of hoopfr3sh in general but I think he too made the lines too white/light on that pair.
Shrug.
Shrug.
- Oct 7, 2014
- 423
- 870
Now THIS is what we should've got year!!!
It's REALLY ****** up too, because Nike was MORE than capable of doing so.
Damn these hard
- Jul 20, 2012
- 1,104
- 1,478
Now THIS is what we should've got year!!!
It's REALLY ****** up too, because Nike was MORE than capable of doing so.
M marztharealist fam , if they would've looked like this, I would've copped doubles.
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,311
- 18,147
Now THIS is what we should've got this year!!!
It's REALLY ****** up too, because Nike was MORE than capable of doing so.
Hmmm. OK, wow. Those look dope on first glance, but I'm with you
1978S
. Those lines--if you're really going for the true-to-OG look--are too white and too stark. They look somewhat cartoonish, like those exaggerated art/drawing posters people sell on sites like Etsy. Just my opinion, no hate AT ALL. But in my world, light gray is what you want, not actual white. And I'm at a bit of a loss on the sail midsole repaint. Now people want their shoes to look slightly yellowed from new? They don't look bad AT ALL. They look cool in their own way ... but that's not an accurate representation of how the OGs or even '99s really looked out of the box. Not to me, anyway.Now, that said, I would love to know how he got the lines onto the seam below the wings, and around the netting. My pair, there is basically no edge of the durabuck protruding out from the shoes to hit those areas much. I started on them and was able to get them in spots, but barely. It would take me a long, excessively patient time to do it more than I did, so I decided, I'm good LOL. But mad respect to him for that part of it.
Regardless, I love seeing people bringing these things way closer to where they should have been in the first place. Shame on Nike
- Jul 20, 2012
- 10,676
- 11,148
I’m leaning towards the lighting in the picture. He’s a sticker for detail and I’m sure he had a pair of 99’s handy to compare to. Either way that’s the shape JB should have gave us fresh out the box.
- Nov 17, 2014
- 8,535
- 6,630
4s for sure.
- Mar 5, 2017
- 3,007
- 10,980
Splitting hairs. I liked them both equally.
The 3s were more comfortable out the box imo.
I think the 3s had more QC issues though based on NT reviews.
- Apr 16, 2014
- 24,085
- 48,746
Probably say 3's....but I haven't worn my 4's yet so my opinion can't hold any real weight. I was happy with the execution on both pairs.
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,384
- 70,954
Both up there.
millzszn93
formerly nikeairmillz93
- Jan 7, 2012
- 8,263
- 8,207
4s easily a better shoe
- Jul 20, 2012
- 10,676
- 11,148
JB **** the bed on both releases, shape being an issue for both. The size of the rand/ cement print on the 3 was atrocious. That alone makes the 4 better to me. At least we can iron the toe cap and add shading to the 4 to fix JB shortcomings.
- Aug 23, 2017
- 1,240
- 3,080
The 3s to wear, but the 4s to look at. Mostly because of materials on the 4 being a bit 'jordan 1 mid' quality.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,649
- 23,642
No wrong answer to this imo. The bc 3 release I enjoyed more simply because I was able to go get em the old fashion way. But the 4 is my favorite between the two releases.
- Feb 7, 2010
- 8,081
- 15,146
IV's
I still use roman numerals for Jordan's...when did ppl stop doing that?
I still use roman numerals for Jordan's...when did ppl stop doing that?
da r entertainment
Supporter
- Jul 20, 2002
- 9,989
- 3,879
Love my 4s!!
- Aug 10, 2003
- 26,256
- 19,684
i like the 3s more.... everything is perfect about them the nike air in the back, the sizing and the shape...you dont have to worry about altering it like the bred 4s... i still like the 4s a lot but specifically these 2 releases id go with the 3s...if we were comparing the CDP id go with the 4s though
- May 2, 2010
- 17,224
- 23,573
my favorite of the recent cements
2016 AJ4 white cement
2018 AJ3 black cement
2016 AJ4 white cement
2018 AJ3 black cement
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,311
- 18,147
The shape of those IIIs is perfect? Those things are an absolute train wreck. I didn’t buy one pair of them, not even for posterity. JB has absolutely destroyed the III during the course of the past 20-plus years. It’s probably the thing I hate those clowns most for
- Jan 2, 2007
- 9,189
- 1,135
It's pretty close for me. I guess I'd probably select the IV's since I never owned a Nike Air version of a IV before. Missed on white cements, even though I might go back to scoop a pair, and I still have the 2001 black cement III's and 88' white cement III's. I still think the 99 black and white cement IV's are some of the greatest pieces of Jordan nostalgia ever made.
- Sep 5, 2014
- 3,113
- 38,173
It's a toss up for me. The IIIs were my favorite release last year, however this year I'm starting to see glitter on the cheap black leather (easily brushed off though). The IVs I didn't like at first, but a slight toebox reshape and edging changed my mind. Yes, the areas under the wings and around the netting were a little difficult to do (I used a toothpick).
- Aug 29, 2003
- 1,000
- 1,548
3's for me just because of the comfort & the elephant print on the toebox is as close to the OG on my pair
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
The shape of those IIIs is perfect? Those things are an absolute train wreck. JB has absolutely destroyed the III during the course of the past 20-plus years. It’s probably the thing I hate those clowns most for
All of this.
Similar threads
