Why didn't you cop the 2020 joints?I hope they retro these next year. I haven't owned a pair since the 07 retro which I wore to the ground.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why didn't you cop the 2020 joints?I hope they retro these next year. I haven't owned a pair since the 07 retro which I wore to the ground.
TBH I should've but when the 2020's released covid first hit and I had to be super selective what kicks I bought due to financial issues.Why didn't you cop the 2020 joints?
I'm not gonna lie brother, you're gonna be waiting awhile. It's only been 4 years since the 2020 Fire Red 5s, and most OG colorways take at least 5-7+ years before they return. Then there's the other OG 5s we still haven't gotten yet. Disregarding the laceless Fresh Prince release, we still haven't seen actual Grape 5s and we also haven't seen Black Tongues yet. So it'll be some time before these come back. Usually I'm against suggesting resell but if you can find a pair for a good price, I'd go for it, personally.I hope they retro these next year. I haven't owned a pair since the 07 retro which I wore to the ground.
I'm not gonna lie brother, you're gonna be waiting awhile. It's only been 4 years since the 2020 Fire Red 5s, and most OG colorways take at least 5-7+ years before they return. Then there's the other OG 5s we still haven't gotten yet. Disregarding the laceless Fresh Prince release, we still haven't seen actual Grape 5s and we also haven't seen Black Tongues yet. So it'll be some time before these come back. Usually I'm against suggesting resell but if you can find a pair for a good price, I'd go for it, personally.
Yeah I've been considering it.Depending on the size these aren't even that bad. A little over retail at most.
Idk I could actually see these dropping again in the next 3-4 years.
They’re trying to sell massive amounts of shoes these days. We’re likely to see the most popular cws releasing more often. Look at black cement 3 and 4. They really have no reason to wait more than 6-7 years between releases.3-4!??
They’re trying to sell massive amounts of shoes these days. We’re likely to see the most popular cws releasing more often. Look at black cement 3 and 4. They really have no reason to wait more than 6-7 years between releases.
Once I get black tongues and Grapes, I'm done with Vs.We better get a black tongue retro before we see these again
Lets hope JB is good to us next year and drops all the heat for the V's.Once I get black tongues and Grapes, I'm done with Vs.
Since we're on the topic, when early pairs of the 2016 Metallic 5s were showing up, some had a molded collar that was treated in a way that allowed the material to kinda imitate the look, at least from a texture standpoint, of the collar on the original release. While the contrast is a bit overdone it would be interesting if JB/Nike decides to go back to that look for the next release. Not saying they should, but it's an idea.I'm hoping the metallics come back soon, it's been long enough. But only if they fix that stupid tongue and put it back closer to the OG and earlier retros. Won't be mad if they put the 23 on the heel again, either.
I LOVE my fire reds from 2020 and wear them all the time, but the tongue is the one thing that drives me nuts about them.
Need that detail on the next retro for sure.Since we're on the topic, when early pairs of the 2016 Metallic 5s were showing up, some had a molded collar that was treated in a way that allowed the material to kinda imitate the look, at least from a texture standpoint, of the collar on the original release. While the contrast is a bit overdone it would be interesting if JB/Nike decides to go back to that look for the next release. Not saying they should, but it's an idea.
Realistically though, the next time they come come back it'll either be a reimagined release like the Black Cement 4s this year or maybe it'll be '16 Metallics but with a less bulbous ankle collar and a toebox more in line with the '20 Fire Reds, accompanied by an OG font 23. Tongue will probably still be the same too, sadly but hopefully I'm wrong. I know many dislike it. While I'd prefer to have the matte 3M look that the OGs and all other 3M 5s used up until 2016, I've gotten used to what we currently have.
Since we're on the topic, when early pairs of the 2016 Metallic 5s were showing up, some had a molded collar that was treated in a way that allowed the material to kinda imitate the look, at least from a texture standpoint, of the collar on the original release. While the contrast is a bit overdone it would be interesting if JB/Nike decides to go back to that look for the next release. Not saying they should, but it's an idea.
Realistically though, the next time they come come back it'll either be a reimagined release like the Black Cement 4s this year or maybe it'll be '16 Metallics but with a less bulbous ankle collar and a toebox more in line with the '20 Fire Reds, accompanied by an OG font 23. Tongue will probably still be the same too, sadly but hopefully I'm wrong. I know many dislike it. While I'd prefer to have the matte 3M look that the OGs and all other 3M 5s used up until 2016, I've gotten used to what we currently have.
You know, I searched the stuff up until I ended up in a corner. The United States Shoe Corporation decided not to renew the trademark for Durabuck™ after it was canceled in 1998, as they had stopped manufacturing it by then. Apparently though, U.S. Shoe was involved in a merger around this time and in 1995 it had its shoe division bought out by a fashion company named Nine West. From what I researched they didn't seem like the type of company to sell athletic wear, so my guess is they were likely involved in the disappearance of theI can't even understand why the tongue change was made, unless 3M (or whoever) literally doesn't make Scotchlite material with that OG-style of finish to it. But I find that difficult to believe. But hey, I also find it difficult to believe no one can replicate the original black Durabuck but apparently that's impossible
I could be wrong but I really don’t think Nike is making any of the materials they’re using. They have teams that source materials from textile companies. So it makes sense that if nobody is making a durabuck-like material then they simply don’t have the ability to use it. They could probably work with one of their suppliers and pay them to develop it but it’s certainly cheaper to just use the synthetic nubuck material that’s already mass produced.You know, I searched the stuff up until I ended up in a corner. The United States Shoe Corporation decided not to renew the trademark for Durabuck™ after it was canceled in 1998, as they had stopped manufacturing it by then. Apparently though, U.S. Shoe was involved in a merger around this time and in 1995 it had its shoe division bought out by a fashion company named Nine West. From what I researched they didn't seem like the type of company to sell athletic wear, so my guess is they were likely involved in the disappearance of the
original Durabuck™ in the sense that, they didn't need the material and as such the details on the manufacturing process were discarded.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure by '99 Nike was making its own Durabuck anyway as seen on the '99 Black Cement 4 and '00 Black Metallic releases. It was probably cheaper for them and as such could be why Nike didn't bother to try and purchase U.S. Shoe's Shoe Division and the trademark for Durabuck™ which would also grant them the ability to manufacture it themselves. Or, this could all just be a tinfoil shoe conspiracy theory and Nike is very well capable of recreating the original Durabuck™ and simply chooses not to.
I hear ya. I didn't mean to say Nike is producing their own Durabuck, like in-house. I just meant they found a replacement that they could use and call their own, as we have no way of knowing who specifically supplies them with the current version of durabuck that they've been using for so long. But, you're more than likely 100% correct that they simply sourced materials from various companies until they found one that fit their needs rather than producing it themselves. Seems like it goes back to the issue of Durabuck™ and its manufacturing process being long gone, and Nike not having any need for it as they've found a suitable replacement for it.I could be wrong but I really don’t think Nike is making any of the materials they’re using. They have teams that source materials from textile companies. So it makes sense that if nobody is making a durabuck-like material then they simply don’t have the ability to use it. They could probably work with one of their suppliers and pay them to develop it but it’s certainly cheaper to just use the synthetic nubuck material that’s already mass produced.
Yes.... fire red silver tongues are one of my favorites but was disappointed with how quickly they yellow. The netting on my 2013 Grape 5's look better than the 2020 fire reds. Maybe JB used a different netting material on the 2020 pair.
You know, I searched the stuff up until I ended up in a corner. The United States Shoe Corporation decided not to renew the trademark for Durabuck™ after it was canceled in 1998, as they had stopped manufacturing it by then. Apparently though, U.S. Shoe was involved in a merger around this time and in 1995 it had its shoe division bought out by a fashion company named Nine West. From what I researched they didn't seem like the type of company to sell athletic wear, so my guess is they were likely involved in the disappearance of the
original Durabuck™ in the sense that, they didn't need the material and as such the details on the manufacturing process were discarded.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure by '99 Nike was making its own Durabuck anyway as seen on the '99 Black Cement 4 and '00 Black Metallic releases. It was probably cheaper for them and as such could be why Nike didn't bother to try and purchase U.S. Shoe's Shoe Division and the trademark for Durabuck™ which would also grant them the ability to manufacture it themselves. Or, this could all just be a tinfoil shoe conspiracy theory and Nike is very well capable of recreating the original Durabuck™ and simply chooses not to.
I could be wrong but I really don’t think Nike is making any of the materials they’re using. They have teams that source materials from textile companies. So it makes sense that if nobody is making a durabuck-like material then they simply don’t have the ability to use it. They could probably work with one of their suppliers and pay them to develop it but it’s certainly cheaper to just use the synthetic nubuck material that’s already mass produced.
I hear ya. I didn't mean to say Nike is producing their own Durabuck, like in-house. I just meant they found a replacement that they could use and call their own, as we have no way of knowing who specifically supplies them with the current version of durabuck that they've been using for so long. But, you're more than likely 100% correct that they simply sourced materials from various companies until they found one that fit their needs rather than producing it themselves. Seems like it goes back to the issue of Durabuck™ and its manufacturing process being long gone, and Nike not having any need for it as they've found a suitable replacement for it.
As doublemesh96 said above the leather is toilet seat leather . I ended up selling the '13 black tongues and fire reds I kept the grapes cause its a favorite. I hope they do these right next time around.How were those '13 retros? I heard they were terrible compared to the '06 release.