bigj505
Staff member
- 42,582
- 21,771
Lol 200 lbs at 6 feet is fat. Average is 170-180 for that height. Hence the fankles
No it's not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol 200 lbs at 6 feet is fat. Average is 170-180 for that height. Hence the fankles
you're right average is even lighter than 170-180 surprisingly lol. Depends on your frame though.No it's not.
I'm 5 7 175 and I don't have kankles. You have to be really overweight to have "kankles."you're right average is even lighter than 170-180 surprisingly lol. Depends on your frame though.No it's not.
THOSE PASTEY LEGS!
Lol 200 lbs at 6 feet is fat. Average is 170-180 for that height. Hence the fankles
6'1" 235 is perfect.....
maybe for someone in high school..lolLol 200 lbs at 6 feet is fat. Average is 170-180 for that height. Hence the fankles
im not making the numbers up i looked up the table online 160-180 is average for a medium frame. 200 could be considered muscular or fat, but not averageLol. No it's not at all. I'm convinced yall must be either boys or grown men who are like 6'0 150lbs soaking wet. Muscle weighs more than fat. 6'0 200lbs is a very nice probably muscular physique.
I have no idea how this weight topic came up but also depends on how you carry it.
A guy 6' that weighs 200 could look really fit/average/ or even lean depending on how his body carries the weight. Hell, he could even look fat. It all depends.
I would say 180-200 is the avg weight range for that height.
came up because of the mean ankle creasing dudes are getting. someone wanted to say that only happens with fat people.