- 1,077
- 20
Don't be suprise you guys. I bought mine for 135 ds. From fellow nter. Patiently waiting for this one tho. So dat my feet can finally walk around az in them flints. Lmao.. prolli will keep my 05 ds for a good while. =/
Air Jordan XIII - Flint colorway to drop November 2010 (via Kicksonfire.com)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by blaz3n,
- Start date
- 4,996
- 91
160 SMH How JB be playing Only Jordans i will pay retail for is the XI's and that's because i have to.
- 4,052
- 1,033
i suppose i could use a new pair. my pods are all pink
- 552
- 10
im ganna cop since i can't find a pair for a decent price on ebay
- 552
- 10
im ganna cop since i can't find a pair for a decent price on ebay
- 1,876
- 13
you dont have to. nobody if forceing you to pay anything its on you if you whant to.
- 151
- 10
160 is a good price....people complain to much, i mean you dont have to buy them lol as for me defiently copped
- 10,321
- 8,214
i bet the same ppl whining about 10 $, didnt have a problem dropping 175+ on a pair of space jams last year
- 15,762
- 517
I mean, if you are willing to pay $150 as it is, what's another $10?
People spend over $200 on Retro Foamposites.
People spend over $200 on Retro Foamposites.
- 15,762
- 517
I'm pretty sure these particular pics haven't been posted yet, but if they were, my apologies....
- 7,965
- 2,730
^Pics look good to me ...
- 151
- 10
me too
- 4,996
- 91
I'm not tripping i'm getting them on discount anyway i just don't see the reason why there is a $10 difference when all other retros are $150
- 15,762
- 517
Every shoe has gotten a price jump.
The original/retro $125 shoes for "2010": VI, VII, IX, and XI - all got an unheard of $25 retail increase.
If JB were to do that to an original $150 shoe, could you imagine? $175.
I think $160 is just fine. And if these go on sale, even better. I think it's definitely a JB strategy to tag the retail price higher nowadays.
- 6,998
- 2,790
Because every other shoe didn't retail for $150 when it originally released. Every other retro went up $20-50, these only went up $10.
- 5,339
- 11
wow they sure did skim on the 3m...but other than that it looks cool
- 7,965
- 2,730
^I was thinking the same as well .. Or maybe just the angle the pics were taken? Either way a definite buy for me .... It is what it is I guess
- 11,534
- 321
dtb00201 wrote:
Dudes are really crying over a $10 increase for a shoe that released 13 years ago. The $50 xi increase is one thing, but $10 isn't really anything to complain about considering every retro has gone up in price.
They retroed them in 2005.
Im one that is for sure not going to pay that 160 price. F that.
Go ahead and be happy with it. I aint. I cant stand the mark up in price and the downfall in quality.
160 for some BS Jordan.
- 10,321
- 8,214
i wonder how many people are going to get thirsty enough, to take the bait and cop from osneaker... for 250.00
- 1,952
- 10
$10 for an increase.. thats just greedy!
- 1,952
- 10
$10 for an increase.. thats just greedy!
- 5,483
- 18
For a $10 increase, you would think Brand Jordan would at least throw in the 3M material.
- 1,518
- 10
lol trueOriginally Posted by brooklynnyc3000
For a $10 increase, you would think Brand Jordan would at least throw in the 3M material.
thats if its absent in the 1st place
- 1,867
- 11
why cop for 250 when you can buy off the bay right now for 180.... retail + tax and shipping and get it 2 months ahead. not bad.
- 10,933
- 4,861
^^^WHY COP FOR 180 WHEN YOU CAN COP FOR 150 AND BELOW COME NOVEMBER? IF I DECIDE TO COP, 30% DISCOUNT WILL BE APPLIED. READILY AVAILABLE....
