- Jul 2, 2001
- 24,020
- 3,135
Calm down.
Air Jordan XX8 SE Shrouldess Video and Official Pics on Page 1 Shoes Hit Stores 10/11/13
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by trethousandgt,
- Start date
- Mar 3, 2012
- 1,373
- 177
There's a lot more to law than what you pick up in two classes
- Jul 18, 2012
- 479
- 173
You don't even need the box to return them to Nike. All you have to do is send them in and they will handle the rest. I have played in my cement 28's 3 times a week since October and haven't had any issues. I can't worry about the "what if's" when there's no concern with getting my money for another shoe from NIke.
- Mar 11, 2013
- 475
- 93
I recently graduated law school, so I will try to lend some legal insight (not that I have much). Disclaimer: This is from a US law perspective. Disclaimer #2: I am not an attorney and am not offering any legal advice.
Whenever you are considering filing a lawsuit, you have to ask what your damages are or what you want to get out of it. In this case, your damages would be that your shoe no longer performs as it should. To rectify the situation, you would either need a replacement shoe or the cost of the shoe. Other than that, there wouldn't seem to be many legitimate damages to be claimed. If you wanted an attorney to handle the case for you, then you would likely have to get lucky and find one who wanted to put a suit against Nike on his/her resume. The attorney won't take a % of the settlement or ruling because it will be worth nothing to him versus the effort of even filing documents or drafting a letter. The attorney may say he will do it if you pay him hourly, but 30 minutes of his time will cost you more than a new pair of XX8s.
If you wanted to make some argument that the products aren't performing or working properly, you can, but you would still only get the cost of the shoes. If you were injured as a result of the defective air bag, then you would have more damages and a worthwhile suit. However, if your damages are just that the shoe no longer works, then you likely won't get more than a new pair or the cost of a new pair.
Also, they probably have an in-house legal team whose pay is not based on billable hours. As a result, being involved in litigation with you probably wouldn't cost them more than not being involved in such litigation. The bigger reason they would want to get rid of it is that such a small lawsuit would be a waste of their legal team's time.
Ultimately, I think Nike would rectify the situation far before it got to litigation. They are almost certainly aware of the issue, and though it may take a few weeks, they will probably give people (hopefully even those who purchase on eBay) a refund or a replacement pair.
Conclusion: These shoes are awesome. I hope your airbags don't pop. I hope Nike refunds anyone who has such issues. I'm looking forward to Feb 1.
Whenever you are considering filing a lawsuit, you have to ask what your damages are or what you want to get out of it. In this case, your damages would be that your shoe no longer performs as it should. To rectify the situation, you would either need a replacement shoe or the cost of the shoe. Other than that, there wouldn't seem to be many legitimate damages to be claimed. If you wanted an attorney to handle the case for you, then you would likely have to get lucky and find one who wanted to put a suit against Nike on his/her resume. The attorney won't take a % of the settlement or ruling because it will be worth nothing to him versus the effort of even filing documents or drafting a letter. The attorney may say he will do it if you pay him hourly, but 30 minutes of his time will cost you more than a new pair of XX8s.
If you wanted to make some argument that the products aren't performing or working properly, you can, but you would still only get the cost of the shoes. If you were injured as a result of the defective air bag, then you would have more damages and a worthwhile suit. However, if your damages are just that the shoe no longer works, then you likely won't get more than a new pair or the cost of a new pair.
Also, they probably have an in-house legal team whose pay is not based on billable hours. As a result, being involved in litigation with you probably wouldn't cost them more than not being involved in such litigation. The bigger reason they would want to get rid of it is that such a small lawsuit would be a waste of their legal team's time.
Ultimately, I think Nike would rectify the situation far before it got to litigation. They are almost certainly aware of the issue, and though it may take a few weeks, they will probably give people (hopefully even those who purchase on eBay) a refund or a replacement pair.
Conclusion: These shoes are awesome. I hope your airbags don't pop. I hope Nike refunds anyone who has such issues. I'm looking forward to Feb 1.
Last edited:
- Aug 5, 2006
- 3,272
- 537
I liked the conclusion more than the law talk.
- Jul 2, 2001
- 24,020
- 3,135
- Aug 8, 2008
- 3,121
- 287
id say Nike Europe customer service dept would send you back to the "retailer" if you went at them with a shoe that dosent sell in Europe.
My point was more about the hassle of it all than the actual legal issues, I mean if you get em directly from a retail store there is less issues but even that doesn’t stop some store sparking on about 28 days return policy etc even if the shoes are defective.
My point was more about the hassle of it all than the actual legal issues, I mean if you get em directly from a retail store there is less issues but even that doesn’t stop some store sparking on about 28 days return policy etc even if the shoes are defective.
- Mar 30, 2008
- 2,709
- 2,283
- Mar 6, 2011
- 1,502
- 55
oh damn Reptile gets you Repped!
- Mar 6, 2011
- 1,502
- 55
what law school did you attend?
- Mar 11, 2013
- 475
- 93
SC (fight on!)
- Mar 6, 2011
- 1,502
- 55
Holy what a stud! Gould top 20.
- Mar 11, 2013
- 475
- 93
lol easily the ugliest building on campus
- Jan 31, 2009
- 857
- 315
shoejocky has the three colorways releasing this saturday for $133 shipped on ebay. they are in hand and shipping this week. i copped and am thrilled with that deal.
go!
go!
- Dec 27, 2012
- 5,850
- 1,508
Repped. Had a reward coupon to use but I'll take that price to know I got em. Much appreciated!
- Sep 4, 2012
- 155
- 32
Repped as well. Thanks, saved me some cash!
- Jan 31, 2009
- 857
- 315
^^^ no problem, fellas. happy to help my fellow NTers.
- Dec 17, 2013
- 85
- 22
More love your way, thanks a ton! saves me getting up early saturday and saves me money. Nice find
- Jan 1, 2009
- 686
- 232
yeah man good looks dude!
- Aug 8, 2008
- 3,121
- 287
^ shame they hardly got any sizes in em...
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
Had my size 12 in the breds though ..
View media item 772097
Paid for expedited shipping .. came out to same thing i would have paid on FNL if i used my WC + shipping. Now i can keep that WC for something else.
Hell of a deal plus i may get them before league game this sunday.
+1 my friend thank you
- Jan 31, 2009
- 857
- 315
they had multiples in each size...until i posted it here on NT. we wiped out the deal.
- Jan 11, 2014
- 33
- 10
Thanks great deal ... I copped a pair of size 12 breds
- Jul 24, 2012
- 1,147
- 165
Love these kicks. Feb is going to be a big month for me stocking some shoes.
